New Gmail rules enforced starting in February should reduce spam, make it easier to unsubscribe from bulk senders, and close email security loopholes exploited by cybercriminals.

  • TheDannysaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah… unless you pay Google. Then they hand deliver "promoted" emails which somehow always fill the top few slots in my email. Funny how that works.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have never in my life seen that. The emails appear in order of arrival. I am confused about what you talk about.

        • XTornado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok I see… not saying is great but those are ads. Not prioritized emails. Like it's an ad that looks like an email… yes I agree it's terrible… but the emails are in the expected order.

          I guess I have never seen it because well as you seem to indicate it is recent. And I mostly use the PC for emails and there I have AdBlock so yeah there neither.

          I have check the phone and I saw some ads but they don't look like emails ata all they are like bigger it's easy to see the difference but they weren't in-between so maybe are the old design.

          In any case it's mostly a free service, except if go over the limit and similar, with quite some costs and with the current environment where ads revenue is going down and money isn't as cheap as it used to be, Google and other companies are all trying to squeeze whatever they can, so everything is going shit…

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Alternative headline: Google is making it even harder for non-Google operators of mail servers to interoperate with gmail.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ehh I dunno, this doesn't really change much for regular mail operators. Anyone can choose to reject any message as spam based on whatever rules they choose, and this seems pretty reasonable.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I certainly don't enjoy having to update my mail server configuration every couple of years. But once done it does make a huge difference to what gets through. I do worry there might be tweaks to make for my patch sending workflow.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This seems like non-news. If a provider sends a notable amount of spam they will be blocked.

    I do hope that they are careful to avoid blocking personal mail servers that send 10 messages getting blocked if 1 is marked as spam.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is literally about changes to senders who make 5k+ messages per day, so yeah, no need to worry.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meh…I don't trust them to do anything which is why I strictly use Gmail for spam, just like I did with Hotmail before that, and my ISPs email before that.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's pure self-interest. They want better information about the person. Spam muddies the waters, so cleaning the up to have the best picture of whoever it is they're surveilling is only reasonable.