• zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, isn't driving in Singapore slower than taking transit? What's even the point of owning a car in Singapore other than showing off?

    • Brkdncr@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah Singapore has good public transit options but it doesn’t handle everything.

      Many people own cars though and the certificate is transferable and is part of the car loan, so it mostly becomes a monthly cost.

      If you’re trying to show off in Singapore you have multiple cars in your own garage, including an old super car and an suv you use to drive to your boat club where you can take your boat out for the day.

    • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, driving cuts travel time in half compared to public transport during off-peak hours.

      The point of owning a car in Singapore is the flexibility in reaching a destination without the need to navigate the public transport system and still needing to walk the last bit of distance.

      That being said, it's not that much more painful to use public transport over vehicular transport and you can live without owning a vehicle.

    • Voli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw a totem bag, out of cheap vinyl plastic for around 200sgd, its about show of wealth that most people will not understand.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'm all for public transport, and limiting the need for cars, but public transport isn't viable for EVERY journey.

      What if you're disabled and have special travel needs?

      Or you're sick/elderly/immunocompromised etc and need to avoid enclosed crowds to avoid catching COVID as it will surely kill you in your current condition?

      What if you're trying to transport something that can't be taken on public transport, like your rotavator to go turn over your allotment? Or your big strimmer? Or even just your big gardening tools to do such jobs by hand? Or maybe you're transporting a load of wood you just bought, or a new window, etc etc.

      Or just a load of family grocery shopping for the week, which would take up several seats on the bus which isn't allowed, assuming you could even get all those bags onto the bus - you cannot can't carry them all once you get off, either, you'd be stranded at the bus stop. You could use a large personal shopping trolley, but again, those have nowhere to go on a bus.

      What if you're going camping and need to transport a bunch of stuff for the whole family down to a camp site?

      What if you need to dump loads of old rubbish down at the tip, day, because you recently demolished your old garden shed, or had a big clean out?

      Talking taxi every single time for these sorts of things is incredibly expensive and not viable, and those are just a few examples of the many reasons you might need to take a personal car over excellent public transport links.

      I love love love public transport and reducing car usage, but getting rid of cars entirely severely limits people's mobility. Cars fill an important niche. We shouldn't all be taking cars for every single journey, that's the main problem we have to tackle as a society, but they are important to maintain access to none the less.

      Seeing news like this, and knowing how it will negatively affect the mobility and life options of the poorest and the most at risk, makes me sad 😔

      • zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In… Singapore? Where the fuck are you transporting a load of wood that you just bought in Singapore?

      • Airazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You're just making shit up.

        Everything you've mentioned is done either by taxi, or by delivery guys with a van. It's not the US, elderly people can call an ambulance to go to a hospital, they don't need to pay for Uber while having a heart attack.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Singapore has a 10-year “certificate of entitlement” (COE) system, introduced in 1990, to control the number of vehicles in the small city-state, which is home to 5.9 million people and can be driven across in less than an hour.

    Including COE, registration fees and taxes, a new standard Toyota Camry Hybrid currently costs S$251,388 ($183,000) in Singapore, compared with $28,855 in the US.

    In 2020, when fewer people in Singapore were driving, the price of COEs dropped to about S$30,000; a post-Covid increase in economic activity has led to more car purchases while the total number of vehicles on the road is capped at about 950,000.

    The rocketing price puts cars firmly out of reach of most middle-income Singaporeans, putting a dent in what sociologist Tan Ern Ser said was the “Singapore dream” of upward social mobility – having cash, a condominium and a car.

    Singaporeans have been hit by persistent inflation and a slowing economy, and some are selling the cars they bought when certificate prices were low to make a profit.

    Jason Guan, 40, an insurance agent and father of two, said he bought his first car, a Toyota Rush, for S$65,000 in 2008, including the price of the COE.


    The original article contains 392 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!