• AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the first time I've even heard of it, and I play strategy games mainly, so there's its first problem.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same, I was about to say that I don't even remember any TW games coming out in the last 10 years.

        • manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Attila came out in 2015 and it’s a very solid game, although quite unforgiving. The Medieval Kingdoms mod for that game is probably as close as we’ll get to a proper medieval 3

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You say this, but companies do love to pretend that employees are numbers and are replaceable but then key devs/designers/product people start leaving and you end up with a real brain drain for all the deeply entrenched institutional knowledge that projects rely upon. They are literally going to need to relearn how to make a good Total War.

  • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tired of these half baked shithouse total war games like pharaoh, troy and britannia. It must be so hard to develop a sequel to medieval, Rome or any of the other successful franchises that people actually want to play

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I'd actually have really liked a Bronze Age Collapse game.

      For all I know, it's this one, HOWEVER, my unplayed library is too big as is, but what definitely wouldn't have made the cut is another Roman strategy game.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are least Britannia was honest about being a saga game, Pharaoh is pretending that it is a mainline release.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apples to oranges comparison. CA builds a lot of games under the Total War banner. Some are very big, very expensive projects (like Rome 2), others are really just a way of testing tech and training devs (like Odysseus). Pharaoh, as I understand it, falls very much into the latter category.

    While the sales numbers look bad on the surface, for what it probably cost to make, I suspect CA is prefectly happy. Remember they literally gave Odysseus away for free. That's just how their release cadence works.

    • trevwilson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      First of all, it's called "A Total War Saga: Troy", not Odysseus.

      More importantly, the "Saga" part of the title is what CA uses to designate the smaller, more experimental projects that you're mentioning, which they explicitly did not use with Pharaoh.

    • clearleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this one is being looked at differently because after hyenas people are wondering if the studio is dead or not