• JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I can too. I put my hand on the input device and the signals my brain sends translates that into the movement of the mouse to a specific location on the screen.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not to brag or anything, but I actually upvoted this comment using nothing but my brain waves attached to an input device

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is something that has been possible for a decade or two with our invasive brain surgery. Just using a modified EEG. This is not a revolution it is old technology with the added risk of brain surgery.

        • pewter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The old stuff I saw around twenty years ago that was actually good was pretty invasive. I think I saw research on Duke doing this with monkeys around 2004 or so. Also I didn’t say it was revolutionary, I’m rejecting the belittling of any advances in technology just because I have the ability to click a mouse with my fully able body.

          • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            So there are a number of Brain-Computer Interfaces with different degrees of invasiveness. The technology exists already to move a mouse with non invasive BIC devices. When you consider both the complications of invasive surgery and implantation of medical devices from startups, which may not exist to provide long term support for their technology. Combined with the long history of Elon Musk and his companies taking short cuts and failing to do due diligence before bringing a product to market. Makes this seem reckless at best.

            I have nothing against advancing technology, but we can do all of this without endangering people. In this case people who are more vulnerable because of disability. I am not against or dismissive of BIC technology. I am very concerned about Elon Musk and how he will cut corners. He could set back research and cause much more harm then good.

            Here is an article about how using start up culture in the bio medical world can effect the disabled when there tech is no longer supported.

            https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete

            • pewter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              The end goal isn’t just to create a brain-controlled mouse. When I’m talking about criticizing advancements because of what they can currently do this is part of my problem. Technology in this vein could be the precursor to mechanically regaining the ability to use your own limbs. People equate justifiably disliking Elon and specific issues with Neuralink to deriding technology in general.

              • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                Did you read my comment? I specifically said I was not against BIC. I did specifically say that I felt Elon Musk could set research back by being sloppy.

                Just to be clear what Elon musk announced was not an advancement in the space of BIC. He is touting a pre-existing technology as an advancement. This from a company that has serious allegations raised about its scientific ethics. Elon has shown before that he doesn’t have a high level of concern and has repeatedly downplayed or suppressed negative information about his companies. There is no reason to believe he will not do the same at Neurolink. I think that anyone who hopes to see the advancement of BIC and the radical improvement to the quality of life for many disabled people it could bring. Should be very concerned about Elon’s role in space.

                • pewter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Did you read my comment?

                  Yeah

                  Just to be clear what Elon musk announced was not an advancement in the space of BIC. He is touting a pre-existing technology as an advancement.

                  Yeah. He said they were controlling a mouse. it’s an advancement for his team, not for BCIs in general. I saw the video. He didn’t even sound that excited about it.

                  Should be very concerned about Elon’s role in [this] space.

                  This is the part I agree with, but it’s not where the criticism and jokes in this thread were directed even though he’s the biggest reason why people don’t like Neuralink.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Excellent question!

      There is no fee, but you may black out only to awaken surrounded by the bodies of political and personal enemies of Elmo. Its called Super Happy Fun Mode.

    • N3Cr0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Subscription fees? They can stream advertisements right into the brain. Best when sleeping.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hello, and thank you for your interest in our product!

      To reduce the go-to-market time, our engineering team focused on the core product first. This means we don’t have a way to remotely disable the implant itself. But don’t worry about incurring additional costs - we have specialized teams to disable the patient while our engineers are hard at work implementing this much-requested feature.

      Best regards,

      Neuralink support

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The first neuralink patient, on the other hand, could only drool and void.

  • Wiitigo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nuh uh, I’m pretty sure he said ‘mouse’, not cursor. So, that could mean two things.