• Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        So fucking good I bought the physical copy and played through like 30 times after buying the rom. It kinda spoiled me because I haven’t been able to find another new GB game of that quality since, even from that same developer.

    • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That was only during a period of high rate counterfeit games being sold around for cheap. This isnt happening anymore because, well, digital piracy.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The Nintendo Seal of Quality is still put on Nintendo games.

        My physical copy of Doki Doki Literature Club Plus on Nintendo Switch has one on the back of the box next to the barcode.

          • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The word perhaps, but the seal is identical in design, color, and function. I believe now it just says “Official Nintendo Seal” which doesnt much change the function except they can’t be sued for licensing bad quality games I guess? Fits in with their anti-consumer theme though.

  • yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    *Ominous rumblings of the horde of Nintendo lawyers being summoned.*

    Nintendo cease and desist (or worse) in 5… 4… 3…

    • rdyoung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Why would be this be a concern? If they publish it in cartridges to be used in original systems, it shouldn’t be a problem for Nintendo, especially if the developers pay Nintendo whatever licensing fee needed.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I doubt Nintendo will let them buy a license. Why would Nintendo sell them a license for a handheld console they don’t even make anymore? It would not encourage sales of their newest product, and therefore they don’t care. Nintendo has historically stopped people from developing homebrew games for their older systems if they get too big or popular, why would they suddenly change now?

        Nintendo is the MOST anti-consumer company of the three major console makers, with Sony following in second. There is no indication they would ever change to do anything that benefits the consumer. They tried to make us all buy NES Mario on Virtual Console twice, and now you can’t even buy VC games, you have to rent them.

        • yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          +1 for the anti-consumer statement.

          This is a company that goes after groups who hold tournaments with their games and issues takedowns against people on video platforms just playing their games. Genuinely an awful company (good games don’t excuse the behavior.)

      • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why would be this be a concern?

        Because companies aren’t cool about stuff like this (even companies you think are cool are not always cool).

        This is not direct action, but remember that this shows the thinking to avoid the wrath of a super-litigious company:

        “Because the project depends on Nintendo’s proprietary libraries, [Valve] have asked me to take the project down.”
        Speaking to PC Gamer via email, Lambert shared that he believed Valve “didn’t want to be tied up in a project involving Nintendo IP.”

        (context note for above: Nintendo 64 version of Portal)

        I wouldn’t doubt the library used to make these games catching a DMCA (even if there was no legal standing for it).

        I also doubt a company would even bother talking about licensing cartridges for platforms so old, though even if they did I don’t think pricing would even be viable for most games/developers.

        Side-note: I can also see newly-made games as an extremely clear-cut non-piracy use for emulation which sounds like something companies would foam at the mouth to prevent.

        • heavy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t know why you’re being down voted for being informative. Nintendo are a notorious bunch of greedy dicks and they do go out of their way to shut down anyone possibly enjoying stuff they no longer support.

          • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It was 1 vote and I can’t even see Lemmy downvotes on my instance (Kbin). Also lots of people seem to have an oddly trusting/nonchalant attitude with this, it reminds me of crocodile vs log (especially when it comes to all of the destroyed fan projects, although in this case it’d make more sense if the one eaten said it was a log and the one on the shore was saying crocodile the whole time)

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nintendo has a horrible history of shitting on its fans and projects such as these. In all probability the modders are actually inadvertently (I haven’t checked) falling into Nintendo’s trademark trap on the Gameboy. The Nintendo logo it shows at the start is a check that enables the boot of the game… and is an asset that must be present on each cart. That means if the logo is displayed… they can sue for trademark infringement. If not then they are exploiting the hardware- and we know what happens from there, unfortunately.

        This is a cool project and I hope it does well but Nintendo is a shit company that doesn’t deserve the fanfare they are given.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It depends on a few factors, but in general yes. The issue is how it gets on the system. Nintendo is staunchly against emulation and has also gone after people who bypass their game systems security. They have a rabid pack of lawyers and the company is more than willing to use them.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    meh, im discouraged to pay money to nintendo anything because they will use that money to take out each and every fan project i like. currently blasting through pokemmo before the inevitable c&d then bye.