As if it wasn’t bad enough that they want me to use a random internet service to add a keyboard to a usb wifi receiver, they have the balls to put this for Firefox users. I clicked out of pure curiosity, as I’m not even remotely interested in involving a corporate internet service in getting my keyboard connected to my computer. This is the message you get now on Logi Options software if you have a Unifying Receiver: This is the message you get now on Logi Options software if you have a Unifying Receiver

For the curious: https://logiwebconnect.com

EDIT: some people on the thread have brought up that the error message being displayed for Firefox users is due to the WebUSB API not being implemented by Firefox due to security concerns. This still does not justify having to use a web app to plug peripherals to a PC.

  • Gerbler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    If your website doesn’t work with non-chromium browsers your website doesn’t work.

    • IOMMU@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, no, this is using the WebUSB most likely which is not supported by Firefox. Regardless of the security implications of the WebUSB API, this is a Firefox specific issue

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I thought that you have to open a website to connect some peripheral was the issue here. You should not need a browser for that at all. The issue here is very clearly Logitech.

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well this is true only in the sense that, half the available browser engines don’t support it.

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lesson learnt. Stop buying products from HP, Adobe and now Logitech. Create a list of shitty companies and share it with everyone. Consumers have the ultimate power, stop buying g their product ans see how quickly they change everything back to normal.

  • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Any simple device, that should just work by plugging it into your computer, that instead demands an internet connection between you and the device… is 100% a device thats designed to steal your information/habits/etc.

    because there is no reason to have the expenditure and costs of running a webservice otherwise.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      it’s 100% a device that is getting returned for a full refund because it literally doesn’t work.

    • extralane@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I own Logitech products and I while I agree it should work out of the box, it’s great you can change the connection to a different USB plug in case you lost one. Until they started providing this web app you had to install their software and it only supported Windows and OSX. On Linux, having it available through Chrome is better than before.

  • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Oh for fucks sake. It’s getting to the point where this needs legislative intervention to put an end to this tomfuckery.

    Every day, I’m inching closer and closer to pulling the trigger on moving to Linux once and for all.

  • hansl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Wait until you learn about the government. To get your birth or marriage certificate, my county requires that you go to a totally shady URL of a private company that actually is in the business of printing those and shipping them, for a fee of course. Oh and enter your SSN and ID please, without knowing if there’s any security standards they follow.

    Am I the only one spooked that the government would not keep those records itself??? And ask a private entity that returns almost nothing if googled by name?!?

    • vojel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      This depends on your government I guess? In Germany the authority for passports is a private company (former state property and now again owned by the Federal Republic of Germany) - but indeed that sounds scary.

      • hansl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, that’s in the US where shady things are done like this a lot. Having lived in diffeeent countries abroad this doesn’t happen anywhere else as far as I can tell.

        • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Mmmm… I sure love how if I want to check my credit score for free I have to go through several different companies, all of which have shady-looking websites that were probably last updated 10yrs ago (but only for the page where you request info on your credit score, otherwise they look fairly modern); especially when said companies have had a reputation for leaking everyone’s info and yet are still the official US contracted companies for it. Granted, it’s been a while since I last tried to do it, but it’s really uncomfortable.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Now imagine having to do this under literal pressure while trying to configure the Logitech controller for your submarine.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Ok well as a Linux user I don’t get any of this. I connect to the keyboard with Bluetooth and it just works when you plug it in. There are no pop-ups or alerts to go to any web pages.

    Just saying life is quite a bit better here in that regard.

    • Nido@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Problem are extra funtionalities. I have a MX Mastee 3. Works perfectly on Linux, but is has a additional Button for the Thumb. Can’t be configured on Linux officially. There’s a third party script called Logiops. It sometimes work, but it’s not relieable either…

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ah yes, extra functionalities probably don’t work on Linux, thats true. I have gotten so used to that but it would be frustrating if I just bought a very expensive MX mouse of course.

        I have just stopping buying those things so in a way I’m missing out, but I also don’t have to deal with this stuff. So its just pros and cons as usual.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Friend bought an Asus motherboard. In the user’s manual, in the pins layout section, there’s no instructions nor description of the pins, but instead a QR code and a text that tell you to scan it for the Pins Layout instructions. (Note: The page is mostly blank and have tons of empty space, beside the QR code and the little small print texts). Scan The QR code, lead to a page to download another PDF. Open the PDF, it have one single page showing the Pins Layout description. (That only took half of the page)

    And my friend wonder why I got so mad.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You just know that that page will be gone one day and then nobody will ever be able to find that pinout anymore

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not to mention that nobody knows what other code that QR code might have run on their device when it was scanned.

        QR codes themselves are a security problem.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This is reminding of how pissed off I am with Adobe recently after using After Effects a lot, documentation, or lack thereof. It’s really hard to find instructions on what a given effect does, or how to use it. Each effect in the effect panel in After Effects itself has an about button in a context menu, but it’s a credit for the author of the effect which is useless and weird anyway because aside from some exceptions the credit is ‘Adobe’ . There’s no locally supplied electronic document for the user manual, it’s all online. That’s frustrating enough, but there doesn’t really seem to be any one single user manual, there’s lots of different things with similar names but with widely varying degrees of detail. Sometimes if you happen to accidentally stumble on to the right section of Adobe’s site that has a list of effects and also details about them (there’s at least one page which just lists them) the degree of detail is variable in the extreme. One effect I tried to use didn’t have any user reference and the best I could find on Adobe’s own website was a dead link to a forum post (not Adobe’s forums, a random internet forum) which I was eventually able to find myself through Google and then recover the video via youtube (the original of course was long since not on that site). That video also, while very helpful, wasn’t even entirely correct because the author of the effect responded to the forum post many years ago to correct some incorrect information in the tutorial.

      I was already furious at this fucking joke of an attempt at documentation of their own software, but I looked up more videos, all from around 2008-2009ish and in those videos, the user was running the Adobe Creative Suite software that used to come in a box before Creative Cloud and they were able to open up a real user manual that came with the software which had documentation for the very effect that they were able to browse to demonstrate some of the concepts for its proper use. WTF!? They had documentation already written and then revoked access to it! Why!? What’s the point? Ant they have the documentation for the effects in some form albeit varyingly useful, on their website, why can’t they just collate it in to a PDF and package with the application download? Resolve does, I use it often. It’s so unprofessional to rely on random internet forum posts from decades past in lieu of proper documentation. People lament users not RTFM well I literally couldn’t.

    • CobraChicken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can sort of see the reason behind it. If they’re hosting the manual then they can keep it updated (typos/mistakes/changes etc.). Printed manuals can become outdated by the time it reaches the buyer.

      What they should’ve done instead was to include a printed version, and then add a QR code to see the latest version online. That would’ve been very handy

      • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The thing is it’s not the entire manual, just one (half) single page that tell me which pins doing what.

        The printed manual is for this specific model (with exact rev. Version) and with the rest of the information available.

        The physical pins on this board is not going to randomly change themselves.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That and crappy microswitches. For some reason all logi mice I had in my life always ended up with failed microswitches after months of usage.

  • RandomVanGloboii@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This happens on Windows, right? What would happen on Linux, would the keyboard still work as it gets connected?

    • lwe@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. They are using WebUSB. That’s only supported on chrome browsers for now. But it also works on Linux. The home automation community makes great use of that api.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What keyboard is this? I certainly don’t have to do any of this. I plug the keyboard in and I’m done. Why do you need to go to a web page?

        Actually I’m just using Bluetooth to connect to it and I don’t use any unified receiver stuff.

  • mayo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    To those wanting to jump ship, Logitech isn’t the only mouse/keyboard company doing this and they’ve been trending in this direction for a while (ever since they ditched Unifying Receiver for Logi Options).