Either way you interpret it, there’s no constructive intention. Simply saying it and not elaborating is an insult, a personal attack or whatever you want to call it.

You forgot the most important part: no ad revenue from text posts on youtube.

What is a text post if not written content? You can’t even write properly, I don’t trust you as an authority on what is written content or not.

No. Vaguely implying that someone has a problem is very much a personal attack. I understand that you’re upset by my opinions but how about you cry me a river?

I’m well aware of the website. Yet, it isn’t able to yield that sweet youtube ad revenue so it will of course not be his preferred outlet.

This is like saying people making videos about Palestine conflict are aiming at the Palestine people. People can care about stuff that doesn’t affect their country directly. You have to be a 12 year old for this to be news.

Stop killing games is larger than being youtube content now. News are reporting about it. How about starting a website where you present this information instead of on a youtube channel? The obvious answer to why not is that he wants the sweet ad revenue that youtube provides at the cost of wasting everyone’s time.

No. Automatic transcriptions have flaws. Why not write down the information? Imagine if instead of writing books, people told stories verbally and then had it automatically transcribed and published straight away. This is why I have a very hard time believing you have read a book since it obviously would massivley suck.

So there’s some magical limitation which only lets him make videos? He’s doomed to solely create videos and if he as much as thinks about writing a blog post, he gets struck by lightning or something? What an interesting phenomenon.

Going for personal attacks when you cannot think of a response? Peak intellect.

So you have to be european to care about the petition? Please.

Yes, you can. Ignorant prick.

I don’t believe that you’ve read a book in your entire life if you consider automatic transcriptions to be comparable to actual written text.

I see it all the time. Maybe your creators don’t care about the feature? Also, you can simply use the description of the video. Of course, this means less ad watch time so obviously not happening.

Automatic transcripts are not comparable to intentionally written text. Are you actually serious?

Watching/listening to a recording is faster than reading something.

That’s just wrong.

I can multitask while listening to it, for instance.

Why post it to youtube in that case? If you’re watching a video where the only the audio is relevant, why the fuck is it a video?

Total shit argument. You can publish text on youtube too.

The brilliant part about writing text is that you don’t have to read all of it. You can have sections where people can find the information they actually are interested in. The only problem is less ad money.

What’s wrong with society for this to happen? Are Americans illiterate?

Hasn’t the idea of “sleep divorce” been circulating In news recently?