MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square334fedilinkarrow-up1703arrow-down1104
arrow-up1599arrow-down1external-linkLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.comMicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square334fedilink
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·2 days agoCan’t tell if bot or posting to the wrong thread…
minus-squareSolidGrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoThe vote ratio suggests a botnet, but what do I know? I’m just some Internet rando.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·2 days agoPlease expand because the article is about “protest votes” and the top level comment I responded to is seemingly about how the doctor who wrote it should have earned less money. It seems completely non sequitur.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoI think they’re talking about the comment you responded to. At least, I hope they are.
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoYeah, sorry about that. I did mean the one you were responding to.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoNo worries. It was obvious in retrospect
Can’t tell if bot or posting to the wrong thread…
The vote ratio suggests a botnet, but what do I know? I’m just some Internet rando.
Please expand because the article is about “protest votes” and the top level comment I responded to is seemingly about how the doctor who wrote it should have earned less money. It seems completely non sequitur.
I think they’re talking about the comment you responded to.
At least, I hope they are.
Oh that would make more sense.
Yeah, sorry about that. I did mean the one you were responding to.
No worries. It was obvious in retrospect