Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square57linkfedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down111
arrow-up1221arrow-down1external-linkReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comTimely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square57linkfedilink
minus-squareWalnutLum@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·1 year agoI still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
minus-squareexocortex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·1 year agoAI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoSo for those in ML it’s easier?
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.
I still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
AI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
So for those in ML it’s easier?
No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.