Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down111
arrow-up1221arrow-down1external-linkReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comTimely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareWalnutLum@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·1 month agoI still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
minus-squareexocortex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·1 month agoAI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoSo for those in ML it’s easier?
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNo it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.
I still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
AI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
So for those in ML it’s easier?
No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.