Basically the title

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Browser too, and the whole activeX, and DirectX api system to practically force windows only development.

        • Mactan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          for the millionth time they get to stand on the shoulders on all the wine development that came before it. and now we have to reckon with the bullshit of proton patches that never go upstream to make wine better for all

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            for the millionth time

            Why are you mad at me? Have I ever even interacted with you before?

            Calm down.

            • Mactan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Coincidently one of the things they list (named pipes) as an improvement is something I’ve had a nuisance with for years. there’s multiple things that I would love wine to have that it does not but proton does

              • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                @mactan @drosophila Problem I run into is most of the games I play have a rootkit anti-cheat and that does not work with wine. So I’m forced to do a virtual machine with virtual gpu pass-through. Big pain in the ass to setup and Ubuntu pretty regularly breaks it with various “upgrades”.

          • Soluna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Tbf if wine were released under regular GNU instead of LGPL, Valve wouldn’t have been able to make Proton proprietary, and so their contributions would also be open source. It is unfortunate that this is the situation, but by using the LGPL license WINE basically permitted this, no?

              • Soluna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Okay my bad, I think I just misunderstand BSD-3 and read somewhere that Proton is Valve’s proprietary software. In terms of open source software, the only licenses I’m really familiar with are GNU, Apache, and MIT. So I read one thing online saying Proton was proprietary and assumed BSD-3 was a proprietary license without looking into it further.