return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agoNo sex. No dating. No marriage. No children. Interest grows in 4B movement to swear off menwww.pbs.orgexternal-linkmessage-square434fedilinkarrow-up1789arrow-down162
arrow-up1727arrow-down1external-linkNo sex. No dating. No marriage. No children. Interest grows in 4B movement to swear off menwww.pbs.orgreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square434fedilink
minus-squareArthur Besse@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down7·edit-24 days ago🥛🤝🦆 (it’s odd that PBS is promoting this, as it is actually a terf movement)
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down19·edit-24 days ago terf transgender-exclusionary radical feminism From the article: Young women don’t want to be intimate with men who don’t fight for women’s rights; it’s showing they don’t respect us. The people complaining about intolerance are themselves intolerant.
minus-squarepsvrh@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down3·4 days ago The people complaining about intolerance are themselves intolerant. Umm, yes. That’s the point.
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 days agoI am VERY aware of the legitimacy of that argument. But the argument here is not to tolerate the intolerant, but to tolerate the people that actually support you. You are arguing a straw man.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down5·4 days agoNot from the article, and yet quite relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4B_movement#Opposition_to_transgender_rights_movements
minus-squareSolarMonkey@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-24 days agoPeople keep posting this around but the changelog indicates that’s a super recent alteration… and probably bad faith. https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/11503618
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoWait till you learn about SERFs
🥛🤝🦆
(it’s odd that PBS is promoting this, as it is actually a terf movement)
transgender-exclusionary radical feminism
From the article:
The people complaining about intolerance are themselves intolerant.
Umm, yes. That’s the point.
I am VERY aware of the legitimacy of that argument. But the argument here is not to tolerate the intolerant, but to tolerate the people that actually support you.
You are arguing a straw man.
Not from the article, and yet quite relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4B_movement#Opposition_to_transgender_rights_movements
People keep posting this around but the changelog indicates that’s a super recent alteration… and probably bad faith.
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/11503618
Wait till you learn about SERFs