The difference is you were shown proof that disagrees with the propaganda that was removed, and your only argument is an unproven suspicion based on the belief in said propaganda.
Biden and Blinken have also been working on a ceasefire for the entire year. They’re working the hardest they ever have on it and all we’ve gotten is us building a failed pier to help Israel launch a military attack.
FYI you can’t use propaganda then claim people are only believing in propaganda
The difference is you were shown proof that disagrees with the propaganda that was removed, and your only argument is an unproven suspicion based on the belief in said propaganda.
What proof?
Biden and Blinken have also been working on a ceasefire for the entire year. They’re working the hardest they ever have on it and all we’ve gotten is us building a failed pier to help Israel launch a military attack.
FYI you can’t use propaganda then claim people are only believing in propaganda
Proof
Yes. Just like Biden and Blinken have been saying they want a ceasefire.
And there is a perfect example of suspicions based on the belief in propaganda.
Thank you for the assist.
What are you taking about? It’s not propaganda when it’s exactly what happened.
we really want to do one
https://www.npr.org/2024/05/31/g-s1-2320/Biden-is rael-hamas-ceasefire-proposal
never mind
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/25/politics/biden-adminstration-paused-push-gaza-ceasefire-push/index.html
Again, proof.
If I gave you the impression that I care to debate you on this, I apologize. But I have no intention to was time with you on this as it is pointless.
I said what I thought needed to be said, and I’m done. Enjoy having the last word.
Ah got it. Can’t respond so just saying I just wanted to insult and leave