• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It actually makes quite a lot of sense if you think about it. Poems generally follow a structure of some sort; a certain amount of syllables per line, a certain rhyming scheme, alliterative patterns, etc. Most poems as we know them are actually rather formulaic by nature, so it seems only natural that a computer would be good at creating something according to a set of configured parameters.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Poetry is about the message and sentiment so now anyone can be a poet as long as they can generate something that resonates with a group of people.

        Although most modern poetry is something like copyright for ads or maybe a video game. So I am sure companies will try to reduce staff on that and pay for this.

        I still don’t buy they are a replacement for humans doing it tbh though based on the graphic art you around. Even when it is “right” it still has this generic slop vibe.

        Peoper editing likely could reduce that feel.

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t follow poetry, but there could be a resurgence of abstract or non pattern following poetry, just like most art has movement that move along with what is happening in the world.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The only poetry I see going around is Rupi Kaur poems, which fits your description. I rarely see someone referencing any of these, for example. Could be due to my social circles, but I don’t really see it in mass media either.