• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        It’s honestly insane that these sorts of technicalities are even possible to block the vote. “I called dictatorshipsies and you weren’t in the parliament building when you clearly, overwhelmingly said ‘no’, so I guess no takesies backsies.” There probably ought to be some sort of provision in Korean law going forward that if it isn’t possible to enter the parliament building, they can hold the vote elsewhere.

        Edit: they have convened elsewhere.

        Edit 2: unanimous vote to end martial law, 190–0.

        • VonReposti@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          17 days ago

          Worth noting is that the unanimous vote includes members of the president’s party (as far as I can see from skimming headlines. They’re dropping fast…)

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yonhap news agency cited the military as saying activities by parliament and political parties would be banned, and that media and publishers would be under the control of the martial law command.

        i see now, article was updated

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Yoon cited a motion by the country’s opposition Democratic Party, which has a majority in parliament

      hol up, just how this happens

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        The president and the government seems to have a longer mandate than the individual representatives.

        They lost the last election, hard, so this is a lame duck government.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      He’s president, not prime minister. Removing him would require an impeachment, which usually has a higher barrier then a no confidence vote, though I’m not familiar with Korean government.