• rarbg@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh man it sure would be nice if the feds had the power to regulate something like this /s

    • da_peda@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They did. That’s the reason for this hack, they wanted Lawful Interception, they got their backdoor. It’s what professionals and privacy advocates said all along, if it exists it will be abused.

  • someguy@pleroma.someotherguy.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    @return2ozma @technology
    10 years ago, the Feds wanted backdoors to all of phones so they could read all of our text messages. Now, the Feds want everyone not to use software that has backdoors so the Chinese cannot read our phones. The Feds don’t want competition.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Thank god, give me my HMAC hash please.

    Nothing more terrifying than losing your phone number these days because of all the accounts tied to it via 2FA.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wish Signal stopped using it. I know you can set a Signal PIN but a lot of the non-techy friends I speak to on Signal probably wouldn’t think to, or look through the settings (not that you need to be “techy” to set it, but you know the kind of learned helplessness most people have about tech). At least a prompt for all users to set an account PIN so their account can’t just be stolen by anyone with their SIM card.

      • ChillPill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They abandoned letting you use the Signal app to send and recieve SMS. You still need to get a code via SMS to activate your Signal account. I believe this is what they are referring to.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The novelty is the fact that it’s ongoing. They haven’t mitigated the hack. The threat actors are still inside the networks, which is why the government is telling people to switch to E2EE apps.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ive been slowly hearing about this over the last week or so, and I couldnt tell if it was real news or just over exaggerated.

    And everyone has been on an on about iphone to android RCS, but no word on if anything is being done to fix the vulnerability.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        RCS doesn’t really do a whole lot of anything. It’s a step up from SMS/MMS, but not by much.

        All the features people think they mean when they’re talking about RCS are proprietary Google extensions that only work if you go through Google’s servers. They’re basically exactly the same as Apple putting iMessage on top; Apple just brags about it while Google tries to trick you into thinking incompatibility is someone else’s fault for not giving them control.