☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agoProvisioning decent living standards for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use, leaving a substantial surplus for other social investments.www.sciencedirect.comexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down12 cross-posted to: science@beehaw.orgpolitics@beehaw.org
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkProvisioning decent living standards for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use, leaving a substantial surplus for other social investments.www.sciencedirect.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square7linkfedilink cross-posted to: science@beehaw.orgpolitics@beehaw.org
minus-squareAvid Amoeba@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9·9 months agoDefinition of decent living standard used in the paper.
minus-squaresocphoenix@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up9·9 months agoSpecifically from their table:
minus-squareAvid Amoeba@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 months agoIf I had to superimpose my feelings on top of this, I’d increase dwelling area to 80 sqm and laptops/computers to 2 per household. 🥲
Definition of decent living standard used in the paper.
Specifically from their table:
If I had to superimpose my feelings on top of this, I’d increase dwelling area to 80 sqm and laptops/computers to 2 per household. 🥲