• john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Right… if you’re going to split that hair then you’re just proving my point.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m not splitting a hair, I’m just telling you I don’t feel that strongly about it because I’m not the one who made it. I’d never heard it before.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I feel bad for anyone who internalizes it after hearing it from someone else.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It doesn’t have to be the whole explanation. It’s not like you get a singular sentence to talk to someone lol.

          • john89@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            No, even adding it takes away from the explanation for the reasons I mentioned.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              “It’s like ham and hamster. Totally unrelated. But that’s just JavaScript, other BlahScripts are related. There was this crazy advertising push for Java back in the '90s that they took advantage of for name recognition.”

              Still a very succinct and straightforward explanation.