Vincent Oriedo, a biotechnology scientist, had just such a question. What lessons have been learned, he asked, from Harris’s defeat in this vital swing county in a crucial battleground state that voted for Joe Biden four years ago, and how are the Democrats applying them?

“They did not answer the question,” he said.

“It tells me that they haven’t learned the lessons and they have their inner state of denial. I’ve been paying careful attention to the influencers within the Democratic party. Their discussions have centred around, ‘If only we messaged better, if only we had a better candidate, if only we did all these superficial things.’ There is really a lack of understanding that they are losing their base, losing constituencies they are taking for granted.”

“We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests. They refuse to take a hard look at what Americans actually believe and meet those needs.”

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    38 minutes ago

    Every breakdown and postmortem i see make it pretty clear:

    If you paid close attention and were well-informed, you voted for Kamala.

    If you believe things aren’t true or didn’t pay close attention, you voted for Trump as a sort of totem for wealth and success, not because of a specific policy of his you like. He just represents making lots of money to you.

    Any grappling with what went wrong or improvements needed within the DNC first needs to reckon with the reality that people aren’t seeing left-wing messaging and are instead exposed to a fake version of leftism pushed constantly by right-wing actors on social media.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    There are Democratic Party people and aligned people who are realistic about why they lost and who they lost. They have contacts within the Party. Hopefully they’ll be listened to.

    We’ll probably get a sense of what if any changes we will see in the upcoming special elections to fill House seats Trump is looting for his Cabinet. Then I believe Florida law requires an election pretty soon to replace Rubio, so that will be a national race we can watch.

    Presumably whoever DeSantis appoints will have a pretty big advantage, but we should watch the message and the votes. It will be too early to be a full reaction against Trump, so we can learn a lot about what resonates with voters.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    In a capitalist society, the role of government should be to protect citizens from corporations.

    If nobody is willing to do that, what use are they?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Three things are needed for this to work: labor, capital, and government authorized violence.

      The first got destroyed, and the second used the third to get bigger than ever.

      So we went from a tricycle to a penny farthing and now we’re falling over.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The government is a tool of the capitalist class in a capitalist society. Democracy was originally for the capitalists and their allies and now is a hedge against revolution.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 minutes ago

        Democracy means “rule by the people as equals”.

        It doesn’t mean " western power".

        To be against democracy as an ideology or concept is to be against having humans rights: to be able to decide how you will live and die and for what purpose the fruits of your labor is used.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    The only lesson to be learnt from this is that forgiving debts, pardoning marinuana offences, wanting fair elections, etc don’t work.

    The only lesson they could learn from this is that they weren’t conservative enough.

    Fuck that lesson.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      They don’t learn the lesson, because they don’t want to. And your examples imo show the problem.

      forgiving debts, pardoning marinuana offences

      These are not solutions, they are bandaids that like a drug keep you dependent on politicians repeating them again and again. Which of course is nice when your only goal is to get relected, but longterm that magic wears off.

  • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Neoliberalism is done, it’s fucked. The liberals wanted and thought they could pull another Bernie and people would just go with it, fuck that.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The left is fucked overall, they have splintered and hate each other more than they hate trump. Meanwhile the right is united.

      This election in particular, the American left has become toxic. If you’re even slightly left or right of any other leftist and you may as well be a nazi to them. No leftist was left enough for the other leftists. “No, I’m the true left, and fuck the rest of you, you’re fascists!” Was basically what every leftists was yelling at each other while not voting, and allowing trump to win. If you’re left and you stood aside and didn’t vote, fuck you.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Bullshit. Run on healthcare and ending genocide in Palestine. Those two issue alone would catapult a candidate into office. The Left has a lot of unfortunate infighting. That doesn’t mean we would reject a good candidate over small differences.

  • kipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Left vs right or democrat vs republican — that framing is a distraction in this political reality. The war is between the 99% and the 1%. It’s the working class vs the billionaire class. Your republican neighbor may be a MAGA religious crazy, voting against his financial interests, but he’s been successfully manipulated by a corrupt party controlled by billionaires. Your other neighbor may ‘vote blue no matter who’, ignoring or ignorant to the fact that most democrats at the state and federal level are also influenced or bought by corporate interests and the 1%. These neighbors are clearly not the same, but they are both supporting the interests and agenda of a billionaire class that is oppressing them.

    That is not to say that republicans or religious extremism are not threats — they very much are — but they have been allowed to gain power due to a broken and corrupt system of government.

    The system is broken because unlimited money gets funneled into politics. It’s destroyed our checks and balances, as well as the incentive structure for our judges and our representatives — most of whom no longer have a primary interest in representing the 99% of us. We are being taxed, robbed, poisoned, oppressed and enslaved by our own government, without even proper representation to show for it.

    We cannot expect that our elected representatives will act in our best interests; they require our constant input and scrutiny of their actions. Either we as a people become more involved with politics at all levels of government, or we start a revolution. The problem of corruption in all levels of our government will not be solved by the corrupted. A continuation and increase of wealth inequality will destroy this country.

    The corporate-backed fascist MAGA-America regime starts tomorrow, but we are not powerless. The 99% has power. We must come together, organize, educate, exercise empathy and patience with one another, and take action; we can take back control. We have to.

    • BothsidesistFraud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Nothing will happen until there is a major crisis of some kind. Life is way too easy for most people. Occupy was a failure for this reason. You need Great Depression style suffering or better yet early 20th century labor conditions in order to get any ball rolling. Great Society was nothing really.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    The Democrat aristocracy do not care about winning.

    They only care about marketing the disaster of their losses so that they can launder billions of dollars in “vote blue” spam campaigns.

    All those donations are going somewhere - to “consultancy firms”. To “ad agencies”. And then they get to enjoy kickbacks from this mutual relationship.

    THEY DON’T NEED TO WIN TO RAKE IN BILLIONS.

    and so they don’t even try.

  • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What funny is everyone knows for a fact what lesson they should’ve learned, and if you ask 3 people they will give you 5 contradicting answers, every single one of which will be the most important strategy advice that stupid dems don’t see. It will usually can be boiled into “They need to focus on this specific issue and only on it, to the detriment of all the others”.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      All voters say Democrats should cut ties with big corporations and focus on economic populism. Taxing big corporations not identity politics whilst giving corporations a tax break.

      Bernie Sanders is what people would have voted for. There is no confusion. The Democratic party does not “understand” this because they do not want to understand it.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In this political environment, when the corporations are the kingmakers, you can’t afford to not be a corporatist. Democrats and Republicans are both very pro-business, but big business likes the Republicans better because they are completely mask-off about letting them do whatever they like, while the Dems have to pretend they care about stuff like regulations to appease their voters.

        Bernie, or someone like him, is essentially fighting an uphill battle. You can’t take money from corporations, while simultaneously having to defend yourself from far-right extremist slander and the DNC actively trying to sabotage you so they can replace you with a corporatist. Meanwhile, Trump can be the big tent and get everybody in bed with him because the right will clearly stoop to any level to win and businesses have no scruples about who sits in the chair as long as they get a return on their investment.

        It’s frustrating. Maddening. We are completely screwed for the foreseeable future unless Trump manages to fuck up even worse than he did in his first term or a grassroots left wing movement really gets going in time for the next election, presuming the institution of voting isn’t completely ratfucked or dismantled by then.

      • ribboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Doesn’t really seem like America really wants to cut ties with big corporations, seeing how people are voting. Nor identity politics for that matter, seems more important than ever among the right wing. Just that their identity politics is of a different kind.

        I’m not saying I know wether it would be a good idea to actually do what you’re proposing. But I think people are way to quick to know the solution. Because it resonates with their own beliefs.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, Bernie participated in two primaries, and in both cases he demonstrably, objectively lost the popular vote, which means that people did not vote for him.
        Which is exactly what I am talking about, your idea sounds good to you, but you base it on your vibes, and numbers tell the different story apparently.

          • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The whole thing about popular vote (I repeat, popular vote) is that whatever you think about the process of actually choosing candidate, and whatever trickery the DNC did, it does not affect how the popular vote went. There could be something to your words if there was a popular vote swinging one way and electoral picking swinging the other, but it wasn’t the case. All the millions people who in your mind would vote for Bernie didn’t show up to do it twice. Either that because they don’t vote and don’t know how democracy works, or because they don’t exist I don’t know, and I leave it up to you to decide which is worse.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests

    Evergreen quote-

    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Unless and until we shut down the propaganda channels serving hostile foreign interests, it’s going to be a long, painful struggle.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’re overestimating the power of foreign propaganda. Harris lost because she refused to break with Biden on Gaza, offered a middle-class economic policy instead of working-class economic populism, and spent the campaign pursuing moderate Republicans as her base abandoned her. Foreign influence campaigns certainly played a part, but they’re not magic; they didn’t force the Democrats to run an out of touch, centrist campaign, and they didn’t create the economic crises facing the working class. If the Democrats had run a campaign that credibly addressed the issues of their base, no amount of foreign propaganda would have kept them from winning.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “The things Harris said, like she was going to give $25,000 for people to buy their first home, there were a lot of people said she was giving their money away to people who didn’t deserve it. It cost her votes. We were trying to tell her that.”

    What’s the answer to that? On the face of it, this says that the electorate don’t want public money spent on helping other people who need help. How do you achieve anything other than conservatism with such an electorate? The only thing I can think is that you have to promise to help more of the electorate, and that the money will be come from the very rich. In other words, the only counter to conservatism is a commitment to actual wealth redistribution, and to going up against the selfish interests of the super-rich. That’s not yet even socialism, but it’s still further to the left that the Democratic Party is willing to go. For now, its leadership would rather lose elections to fascists than challenge billionaires.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Giving everyone 25K means housing prices go up by 25K. It was a very bad idea and would benefit the billionaire class.

      What should have been done was capping rent and building more houses.

          • mhague@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            How did you transmute “25k for families that haven’t missed a bill payment in 2 years and who are buying their first home” into “everyone getting 25k to buy a home”?

            Do you just disagree with whatever endgame you imagine she’s reaching for, and are speaking to that? Like that policy is just shorthand for something like “everyone gets free money” and that would be bad, so her policy is bad?

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              How do you transmute giving everyone free money into fixing a housing crisis?

              The solution is extremely obvious, and has been done many times: government funded social housing.

              Giving people more money to buy a house does not create houses out of thin air. It does not fix a supply shortage, it only exacerbates the crisis.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            First time buyers have had bonuses across the U.S. for years. It absolutely has nothing to do with house prices being higher. Texas does it, Tennessee, Florida, California… Probably everywhere

      • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Capping rent makes more housing less likely. Are you suggesting government built housing?

        Not allowing one or two private equity firms to own a lions share of the market would help.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Government built housing is how the UK solved the problem last time. Then Thatcher sold it off and there hasn’t been any real interest in doing it again despite all the same problems coming back.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Non profit housing, be it through companies owjed by the municipality or cooperatives who provide housing to their members are very effective means to limit rents and provide housing.

          In many European countries it used to be normal for a large part of the rental market to be in the hand of such entities or even housing built to be buyed to own by lower middle class families.

          Incidently rents started exploding after a lot of these got privatized in the 80s to 00s.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There needs to be a culture change in how Democrats and progressivea raise their children politically.

    Conservatives raise their children to vote, every time. Local, state, national. Every time. They actually show up on election day and they vote even when they have to hold their noses and they don’t like their candidate. Democrats find some excuse as to why their candidate is not worthy their vote and many stay home because they are mad about something in their own party.

    That’s how Republicans can win again and again even when they are a minority of the population.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s about how people raise their kids. It’s the propaganda fed to people. It’s easier to hate and fear than it is to work for change. If I tell you that you are struggling because you are being invaded and people are raping your neighbors and stealing your jobs and I’ll fix it, vs someone saying times are tough and we need to work on solutions to make us better for the future, a good many people choose the easy route. The number of people in their 20s and 30s that don’t vote the same as their parents is vast.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Nah, for Conservatives, raising a conservative voter begins at birth. I’ve lived in that culture for a very long time.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, I’m pointing out what Democrats fail to understand about conservatives.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Well, I’m not in denial. This country is full of fucking idiots. The next Democratic presidential candidate should be a celebrity that promises to achieve world peace and full gay space communism. Apparently empty promises and celebrity are what win elections.

    • ECB@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think you may have missed the point a bit. It’s exactly these ‘empty promises’ which have been the democrats issue over the past 30 years.

      They get elected on messages like ‘make the economy work work everyday americans’ and then once in office they prioritize the status quo and making sure that nothing major changes. This benefits the wealth and damages everyday people, many of whom voted for them in the hopes that the democrats would improve their situation.

      As awful as much of their platform is, the Republicans have proven that they aren’t scared to break things and make big changes. This appeals to many voters who feel let down by empty promises.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Name one of those empty promises and let’s review how they were voted on in congress. If the Democrats voted against it then your comment has merit, if Republicans blocked it your comment has no merit

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You don’t get to just blame the opposition for making sure nothing got done. Especially when the other party manages to succeed when they have power.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            What are you even talking about? I do get to blame the Congress members who vote for or against something. That is your civic duty. What do you do, check boxes for funsies?

      • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Democrats say good things for the people. Democrats win = Republicans just block everything and embarrass Democrats for it. Republican voters also go without understanding… The main thing is against the “enemy” (i.e. against America…)

        Of course the Republicans only build shit and destroy America besides blocking everything good that would benefit the American citizen (you). But it was the Democrats… who accept a democratic election and after defeat. NOT block everything from Republicans. How deluded can you be.

    • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Next? I’m sorry, but democracy continues to be dismantled. The train has left the station. Trump already had 4 years of training and now with direct support from Musk… Hate fear and more hate mongering…and Trump is using it… So are accusations of election meddling etc… fuck why hasn’t there been that accusation even from Democrats? That’s it… Its game over.

      All those highly secured nuclear secrets or files in the restroom at the golf club… anyone who steals something like that… also steals/cheats in the election. But not 1 accusation… Republicans as well as Democrats don’t want democracy anymore. A convicted highly criminal traitor to the country and enemy of the state becomes president without riots etc… The Democrats who are now just pointing at the Republicans with “I told you so” but not doing a riot or anything else are just as hostile to democracy.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just look at the responses, complete denial. The american people overwhelmingly didn’t want kamala, the democrats thought they could pull another Bernie and we would just do what they wanted. No, it doesn’t work that way, and no they haven’t learned their lesson. They won’t so long as they retain a modicum of power. Democrats and Republicans are the problem.