ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoBluesky now has 30 million users.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square200fedilinkarrow-up1933arrow-down139
arrow-up1894arrow-down1external-linkBluesky now has 30 million users.www.theverge.comForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square200fedilink
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·3 days ago Let’s not call disabling the right to sue a “business risk”. …and why not? That’s like calling the right to stop paying for the service a “risk” But…that’s what it is? I promise if they could remove that risk with a few words in the TOS, and it was legal, they’d all be doing that too.
minus-squaretabular@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·3 days agoThe right to take legal action for harm done is imperative. It’s importance is diminished if conflated with a legitimate business risk (like research and development). It should be illegal to deny it.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down3·3 days agoI agree. But we weren’t discussing hypotheticals, we were discussing reality.
…and why not?
But…that’s what it is? I promise if they could remove that risk with a few words in the TOS, and it was legal, they’d all be doing that too.
The right to take legal action for harm done is imperative. It’s importance is diminished if conflated with a legitimate business risk (like research and development). It should be illegal to deny it.
I agree. But we weren’t discussing hypotheticals, we were discussing reality.