• debounced@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      it’s also a big FU to everyone accessing Gmail’s web interface over geostationary satellite internet connections. i had to deal with that shit for a few months and HTML mode was the only way to ease the pain from how bad the latency can get. the “normal” view would hang like a mofo all the time.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it would and I will never understand why someone would use the web interface.

          • Ansis@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because Gmail filters emails by type. Receiving emails on a client throws all the garbage in one inbox.

            • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, I don't use gmail much, but I really just want a normal inbox, folders, and rules I can define to filter stuff. Netscape E-Mail circa 1998 was all I ever wanted, and I still miss the PITA trying to get even close to that interface today.

            • Clegko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not quite, though. Gmail uses labels, but translates that to folders on IMAP. You can set your client to download the folders automatically, and if an email goes into a specific folder don't put it in the app's Inbox. Then you just check your inbox and folders just like you would on Gmail's webclient.

          • Nahvi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t speak for others, but I typically don’t use email on the PC. When it is more convenient to use the PC, usually because of an attachment, I will log into the browser version.

      • Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. I’ve reverted to HTML mode recently when tethering from my phone. The signal is bad enough sometimes that it makes a world of difference. Gmail was virtually unusable until I realized HTML mode was still an option.

        Really just time to bite the bullet and acknowledge that it is worth the hassle to switch away from a company that I don’t like or trust.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      The big tragedy there is the loss for the visually impaired. They can switch to a new email provider, but they will have to switch over any necessary emails such as subscription reminders and they will have to be able to download or transfer what might be a decade’s worth of archived emails. That will likely be beyond some of them in terms of technical capability and possibly accessibility.

      But then Google couldn’t give two shits about the disabled.

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They'd be better off using a client like tetramail that is designed for the visually impaired. Afaik Gmail still supports imap