• Eochaid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wait, so first you were complaining it's not dark enough and now you're complaining it's too dark and not utopian enough? Bro…

    Also, I said they were trying to capture the tone of a positive sci-fi story like Star Trek, not create star trek fan fiction. The game world shows significant progress towards solving various social, equality, and health issues, but we haven't quite gotten rid of money, and as such, greed. For this reason, we still have economic disparity, corporate evil, pirates that do evil things for money, and a monopoly banking system that uses it's power to use an abuse it's opponents.

    Furthermore, there's plenty of people who have a problem with an overbearing singular government and want to do things their way - thus why the freestar collective and crimson fleet exist.

    Its earth + 1, better, but still flawed. Which is honestly, a lot more realistic than star trek ever seemed to be. Perhaps they wanted to show a "missing link" between current humanity and star trek humanity. There's progress, but there's still work to do. Which, given the lack of aliens, its probably a good move to make sure humanity still manufactures drama.

    Regardless, the theme and tone of the game can be best described as "hopeful and wide-eyed optimism", which is very different from the distopian unease of Fallout and sweeping fantasy epic of Skyrim and, starfield was very clearly marketed as such from day one.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No no no, I'm saying your claim that they said it's supposed to be like Star Trek (which I never saw mentioned at all) doesn't make sense.

      Though I agree with your latter paragraphs 👍

      I'll add, I'm not a hater and have absolutely defended the game in many aspects (check my post history if you'd like), I do think there are valid criticisms and odd choices though. I'm at 177 hours with it, played through all the side quests I could find and started ng+, made it most of the way through again but now I'm already at the point of, "eh, theres not a whole lot left to do but rehash what I've already done for slightly better rewards"

      I have high hopes for the mod community as they have been able to consistently breath life and add addition QoL fixes to Bethesda games for years, and I am massively appreciative of them giving me more reasons to jump back into some of my favorite games :)

      • Eochaid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They never said "star trek in space" because, first of all, that's redundant, and second of all, would invite lawsuits. I'm not even necessarily saying that they're copying star trek in any way.

        I'm using Star Trek as an illustration of the positive sci-fi genre and the tone they were putting out in their marketing. No, its not literally star trek - but unlike their other titles that are either distopian sci-fi or a semi-dark epic fantasy, this one has a more positive tone - there's a sense of hope and compassion that even persists in more distopian areas like the well, cydonia, ryujin, and ebbside. And furthermore, the main story's focus on the excitement and wonder of exploration, and traversing the unknown, is a love note for Star Trek and all the sci-fi novels strewn about the environment.

        And though this clarification is quite separated from it's context now, I only brought this up to say that this game is far more hopeful and optimistic than their previous games and I feel like their marketing illustrated it quite well. And the reason it matters is beacuse the lack of the "darkness" and "grittiness" you are looking for can be explained by this difference in tone.