• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’m trying to, but Proton made me throw up in my mouth a little.

    Now I have the option to do everything I was doing, but poorly AND spread across 3 vendors.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        CEO went full maga, was given an opportunity to correct, then doubled down. After receiving blowback he tripled down and then started lashing out at customers using official channels.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          After receiving blowback he tripled down and then started lashing out at customers using official channels.

          damn, i only followed the dramma for the first couple posts, do you mind posting a link to read the third one?

            • Kukelbrecht@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              So if I open an account with Posteo and then configure it so I’m using Apple’s Mail app on my mobile devices to read the email, am I defeating the privacy and/encription entirely? Posteo does not have a dedicated email client.

              • ShotDonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                No, not entirely. Posteo uses at least strong TLS (transport route encryption), meaning the message can hardly be intercepted between your (posteo) mailserver and the recipient mailserver. Everything else is unencrypted: the emails rest unencrypted on the posteo server (unless you activate crypt sorage, easy to do) and on the recipient server (e.g. Gmail). The latter will analyse your emails even if you never consented. All this can be stopped using Posteo, though. They provide a lot of tools help on this on their homepage. Look for PGP and inbound encryption.

  • hulfpa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    This move makes zero sense to me. Why, change it? It’s not it’s official name or international recognized name so wtf

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      The USA is now part of a list of “sensitive countries” with authoritarian states with their own version of reality. When users in one of the countries on this list visit Google sites, they see that government’s version of reality. This is nothing new. Google does it all the time with disputed territories. It’s only news because it’s the first time the US has an authoritarian government.

      Here’s how it looks when visiting from a Mexican device with the language set to Australian English while located in Hungary.

      1000019054

      Edit: undoxxed myself lol

    • ooli2@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      pleasing the power, so they remove any law that protect our privacy against google prying eye

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Can someone explain the 4D chess going on here? AFAIK this was just tweet diplomacy, the US hasn’t passed anything about this. So why would google want to handle all the complaints and backlash they’ll take for this?

    • ooli2@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      backlash? where? did google received any complaint ever?