A lawsuit filed by more victims of the sex trafficking operation claims that Pornhub’s moderation staff ignored reports of their abuse videos.


Sixty-one additional women are suing Pornhub’s parent company, claiming that the company failed to take down videos of their abuse as part of the sex trafficking operation Girls Do Porn. They’re suing the company and its sites for sex trafficking, racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and human trafficking.

The complaint, filed on Tuesday, includes what it claims are internal emails obtained by the plaintiffs, represented by Holm Law Group, between Pornhub moderation staff. The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos, and that the company intentionally ignored repeated reports from victims in those videos.

The damages and restitution they seek amounts to more than $311,100,000. They demand a jury trial, and seek damages of $5 million per plaintiff, as well as restitution for all the money Aylo, the new name for Pornhub’s parent company, earned “marketing, selling and exploiting Plaintiffs’ videos in an amount that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars for each plaintiff.”

The plaintiffs are 61 more unnamed “Jane Doe” victims of Girls Do Porn, adding to the 60 that sued Pornhub in 2020 for similar claims.
Girls Do Porn was a federally-convicted sex trafficking ring that coerced young women into filming pornographic videos under the pretense of “modeling” gigs. In some cases, the women were violently abused. The operators told them that the videos would never appear online, so that their home communities wouldn’t find out, but they uploaded the footage to sites like Pornhub, where the videos went viral—and in many instances, destroyed their lives. Girls Do Porn was an official Pornhub content partner, with its videos frequently appearing on the front page, where they gathered millions of views.

read more: https://www.404media.co/girls-do-porn-victims-sue-pornhub-for-300-million/

archive: https://archive.ph/zQWt3#selection-593.0-609.599

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool, I know what to think about you. Irrational and judgemental.

    You're really going to place blame at a dude who just saw what was, presumably, some good, legal porn on a legitimate source, freely available to anyone? Rather than the producers? Or in anywhere near equal measure? Enough to call them a piece of shit? Man I'm glad I don't know you.

    • eatthecake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all.of us see porn as necessary or useful. Let alone a right. Yall are pathetic addicts in my eyes. And you are absolutely responsible for ensuring that the porn you watch is adult and consensual.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        And you're a raging social deviant in my eyes, willing to attack someone trying to do better around something society deems acceptable. We can do this all day, sling mud, and shout into the void, or we can have an actual dialog.

        Also that's ridiculous. Anyone manufacturing anything is the responsible party for ensuring their stuff is safe. Or have you never heard of a manufacturer recall? It's the same principle. They made bad porn, they get the trouble.

        • eatthecake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes i am a social deviant.
          They made bad porn because people want it. People did this.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            And they make computers and cell phones with slavery because we want it. It cuts both ways. Help people be better or sit down.

                  • s_s@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Something in the universe can be wrong, and you can also hold an opinion against that wrong that is also nowhere near the truth. There are lots of ways to be wrong.

                    Just because you are against something wrong, doesn't make you right. And being vehemently against something doesn't make you vehemently correct.

                  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Are these "defenders" here with us now?

                    Seriously, of anyone defending the producers are in this thread, they're so far downvoted that I haven't seen em.

      • PurplePropagule@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And you are absolutely responsible for ensuring that the porn you watch is adult and consensual.

        Well… no. But even if viewers were, how do you go about ensuring that it's abuse free? It's not like you can just google the production company. There are plenty of times where there aren't any publicly available allegations so you can never be sure. When it comes to amateur porn, how do you know if their partner is forcing them into it or not? There's no way to prove anything for sure unless there is a public record of allegations.