• Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    OVH, Mega, insert lots and lots of other providers here. They probably can handle DDOS etc good enough.

    I mean is it only for some niche usage (which is totally okay and fine) like serving lots of static data from lesser unknown providers then?

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are two aspects you are ignoring here:

      • with IPFS you can do it from your own computer

      • it is content addressable, files are addressed by their hash, which means you can have a system, e.g, different Lemmy instance admins can share a IPFS server and it gets automatically deduplicated, or you can have something like trustless package managers that run without the need of a central authority.

      Might not be useful for you, but it should be useful for a lot of people.

        • rglullis@communick.newsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are really failing to understand how it works, and I am failing to explain it properly.

          similar to https://mysite.com/folder1/IMG.jpg

          No. Similar to a Distributed Hash Table. It won't matter if people go https://mysite or https://yoursite`. With a DHT, all you need is the hash of the file, and your node will be able to locate all servers who have the relevant pieces of data and send it to you.

            • rglullis@communick.newsOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then we are going to go in circles: people already described use-cases and your knee-jerk reaction is to respond with "but I can do *something vaguely related* with OVH".

              This gets tiring, and I'd rather do something else with my time. Have a good one.

              • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe you're right, and I fail to find any kind of usefulness for this distributed hash table. I really try though, sorry to inconvenience you, but it sure feels like a BTC ledger without the security nor the longevity.

                • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  As with a lot of things in the crypto adjacent space, they’re offering a solution looking for problems. Some problems (such as storing and distributing files) are essentially solved (many cheap providers for both storage, distribution, and/or both to choose from), while others (such cryptographically secured immutable ledger for provenance tracking in specific use-cases) might benefit from the technology. Knowing which is which and where to adopt what tech is the challenging part.

                  • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I'm 100 percent with you here, I definitely feel like the IPFS "crowd" is trying to find a usefulness, and I hope they do. I'm all for decentralized, protected communication, storage and so on! If you need a proof of that just ask and I'll deliver.

                    But it feels like they are still looking for that usefulness.

                    I'm not even here saying "prove me this or that", but I do question the usability which I understand can be felt like an attack for some people.