• FuzzyDunlop@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Which one really did it? We’ll never know

    Oh, we will, be reassured that we will find out eventually.

    Could the US or China have done this covertly? Yes.

    So this is what we find on Lemmy? A russian apologist as top post?

    First post and this is what I read. mmmkay “The USA or China could have destroyed this dam covertly”, right… The good old russian strategy of making you doubt everything you read. The goal of the russian propaganda is not to lie, the goal is to make you trust nothing, and specially not journalists.

    A quick look at your history and you constantly bash the Ukrainian resistance.

    • lntl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yikes! I dunno about that. I’m just saying that we should think critically about what we hear the media.

      • FuzzyDunlop@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Think critically” you say? So where are your facts? Because thinking critically is all about the facts. You have brushed away all the facts and declared “We will never know”. So where are your facts?

        For example the russians had control of the dam, not the ukrainians. It’s just an example. What do you make of it? Come on, show us your “critical thinking”.

        • JillyB@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article was behind a paywall so apologies if this is covered:

          The dam sluices were Russian controlled but the dam is on the front line. It easily could have been attacked by either side. Both sides will see flooding but moreso the Russian side because it’s flatter. Breaching the dam will empty the canal providing much-needed water to Crimea. The lower water level upstream could threaten the safety of an offline nuclear plant upriver. I can’t tell which side controls the plant, so I’m not sure who that would affect more.

          Russia could have easily done this to distract Ukraine ahead of it’s counteroffensive and to make the river harder to cross. Also, Ukraine is likely more concerned about helping Ukrainians than Russia. But Ukraine could have done it for the reasons stated. We’re definitely still in the fog of war and it’s ignorant to assume we know all the details.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The lower water level upstream could threaten the safety of an offline nuclear plant upriver.

            The plant is in the cold shutdown right now, so while it still need some water as cooling, the amount is way lower than in case of normal work, so even in the worst case of complete dam destruction it will not be affected as it is now.

            I can’t tell which side controls the plant, so I’m not sure who that would affect more.

            Currently Russia.

            Russia could have easily done this to distract Ukraine ahead of it’s counteroffensive and to make the river harder to cross.

            Problem is, nobody proven that offensive is even real, not to mention that it was prepared there. Currently the most intensive fights are being waged somewhere else. Also Russia recently hit at least two or three huge UA ammo depots which probably really did hampered any preparations. And the battle of Bakhmut was colossal meat grinder where regardless if we agree on exact numbers, Ukraine lost some of their best soldiers remaining (exactly those who would spearhead the offensive) and Russia lost mercenaries.

            Both sides will see flooding but moreso the Russian side because it’s flatter.

            Also basically all Russian defensive positions along the river were destroyed, countering the guy above on similar level i could say UA surely hit it because it will make their attack much easier when the flood lessens.

            Finally, UA already had plans for exactly that action last year, as they admitted to WaPo: