China’s foreign minister said Saturday that Israel has gone too far in responding to last week’s invasion by Hamas, China’s official news agency reported.

Speaking to Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Israel’s actions have extended beyond self-defense.

According to Xinhua, China has an interest in helping resolve the conflict and the underlying issues involving the Palestinian population.

  • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AR15s are not trademarked US weaponry. An AR15 is not proof of american military presence. Its just a gun.

    Do I need to dumb down questions for you? Should I avoid big boy words?

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      … Are you dumb? AR-15 is the civilian moniker for M-16. You know that right? There's no way to distinguish the damage they do from one another.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You genuinely have no idea what you were asked, and its so fucking funny.

        Its like someone told me they trained their dog really well, so I tell the dog (you) to fetch a ball. And the dog (you) keeps trying to put its paw in my hand. No you dumb dog! Fetch!

        Im not using complex ideas, Im speaking in simple sentences, Im repeating myself for you when you fuck up, and you still dont grok a thing.

        "Hurrr, but AR? But AR? That merica weapon? Weapon, in merica? AR? It M16? Hurr? What was question?"

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There's no way to distinguish the damage. It would be like comparing ar-15 with m-16. It's impossible. And thus, you've proven why China simply says fuck you.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            … Do you think that terrorists on american soil would attack with ARs?

            Do you think that the american military only uses the M16, as its singular weapon, and would respond with such to a terror attack?

            Do you think the only evidence of non military strikes are if you can see an AR in frame?

            Genuinely, you have no clue what youre talking about.

            • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wait, do you not know there's domestic terrorism? Do you think the Jan 6th rioters used foreign weapons? BLM? Yet the police still had to deal with them, sometimes violently.

              I don't get where you are getting this foreign terrorist idea from

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The jan 6th rioters mostly didnt use weapons at all, but the ones carrying used open market sold firearms. Not military issued and grade weaponry.

                Ill be honest, I dont think you know what BLM even was. You keep bringing it up like its even remotely on topic. Do you watch a lot of fox news?

                Let me spell it out for you. Ill keep it simple. Read slowly, and sound out the words.

                China makes their own weaponry. Their weapons, like all weapons, leave specific patterns of damage and debris. Every nation has heavily studied these weaponry patterns, and can easily determine what weapons could and couldnt cause a given type of damage.

                China doesnt sell its weapons to the people, and really never has. The public chinese gun market was mostly foreign made, and chinese weapons were mostly used for self arming or selling to other nations. There are a lot of political reasons for that, but they dont matter for this. The end result was foreign guns in the peoples hands, and state made guns in state sponsored hands.

                What this means is any evidence of non chinese weaponry would prove actions of terrorists. Any evidence. Left behind guns, bombs, grenades, any bullet casings, any identifying fragments of weaponry, specific destructive patterns, literally anything.

                Even a single non chinese bullet dug out of a wall would prove china right, because chinese military would never have those bullets.

                China has nothing to show. Despite how easy it would be to find any type of this evidence.

                • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Right so ignoring your ignorance I will repeat, people use weapons they create. The Chinese used Chinese weapons. And I'd love you to explain how to differentiate the casings of a Russian SKS and a Chinese made one. Or a markarov. Oh wait, they're exactly the same. And that was the primary weapons for both the civilians and the military at that time. Well damn, I guess your just wrong

                  • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    … Are you claiming that people only use guns they handcraft? And not purchase? Because the chinese public gun market from 1870 to the massacre was almost exclusively foreign models.

                    You tell the difference based on manufacturer differences. They burn and bend the casings differently. You can id which factory an SKS came from via that. Same thing for bullets, you can tell exactly which gun fired a bullet based on the damage done to the bullet by the chamber. Thats how cops can id which gun was used at the scene of a crime.