Deepfake Porn Is Out of Control::New research shows the number of deepfake videos is skyrocketing—and the world's biggest search engines are funneling clicks to dozens of sites dedicated to the nonconsensual fakes.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, I think it's good to identify why non-consenting pornography is considered a bad thing. And why it being considered a bad thing is different than what you are saying here.

      Deep fake pornography for the people targeted (which is not just famous people) is incredibly invasive. Your image is out there doing things that you would be horrified to have on camera. It can destroy people's health and cause huge problems, especially for people who are being harassed by others.

      It's not Pearl clutching. It's a rather damaging technology that benefits no one.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        By default, creating and publishing "deepfake porn" of a real person constitutes defamation against that person, as it carries the false statement "this person posed for this picture" which is likely to cause that person harm. Often, the intention is to cause harm.

        As such, we don't need new laws here. Existing laws against defamation just need to be applied.

        • sfgifz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let's see you put your money where your mouth is after we get some deep fakes of your turd eating fetishes get sent to your friends.

        • damndotcommie@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look folks, it's the Simone Biles of mental gymnastics. You have some serious growing up to do if that's your argument. Just because it's potentially fake doesn't make it any less of an invasion of privacy. So your argument is that everyone shouldn't give a shit about privacy, especially their own?