kingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 天前Onion be onioning againsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1806arrow-down19
arrow-up1797arrow-down1imageOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.workskingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 天前message-square56linkfedilink
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 天前Schadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 天前I mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-212 天前Ze fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke! Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
It’s actually Schadenfreude
Schadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
I mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
Ze fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke!
Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
Do you mean silent as in ilent?