MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-213 days agoYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square436linkfedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down1338cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1869arrow-down1external-linkYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comMolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-213 days agomessage-square436linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareunderline960@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 days agoWhat does Chenoweth consider is violent? Where’s the line where she would classify your movement as violent (and therefore likely to fail)?
minus-squarewpb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-211 days agoIf I have to be completely honest with you, and this is an indictment of their research, it seems heavily dependent on what the protest is for or against.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 days agoYeah that seems to check out, the whole study seems to have been an exercise of trying to prove their believed concept instead of testing it.
What does Chenoweth consider is violent?
Where’s the line where she would classify your movement as violent (and therefore likely to fail)?
If I have to be completely honest with you, and this is an indictment of their research, it seems heavily dependent on what the protest is for or against.
Yeah that seems to check out, the whole study seems to have been an exercise of trying to prove their believed concept instead of testing it.