• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or there are people with an interest in keeping it that way.

    I don’t think there’s any big conspiracy about YouTube titles, but let’s not pretend thing like wealth inequality still exist because they’re not harmful.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?

      Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you serious? You literally answered your own question with the very next sentence.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can go and read my comment again if you’re confused. It’s pretty clear that I was saying your original argument might apply to YouTube titles, but doesn’t apply in many other parts of life.