• YaBoyMax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the contrary, I think that totalitarian states are moreso the exception than the rule in this day and age. Hell, I wouldn’t even group Russia in the same class. There are varying degrees of autocracy and the US president certainly wields more power than heads of state/government in many European countries, but it’s just a bad faith argument to try to draw a comparison to it when speaking about a regime such as the CCP.

      • carl_marks_1312 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean yeah one has a bourgeois state (US) and the other an proletarian one (PRC) so technically you’re right in that it’s not really comparable.

        Do you know what hegemony means? And do you think it’s a coincidence that you hold the same belief as the US state department?

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        regime such as the CCP

        People would probably take you at least a little more seriously if you knew the actual acronym of the Communist Party of China. “Le ebil SeeSeePee” just outs you as a redditor, no matter what other gestures you might make toward the appearance of wordliness.