The game is quite long for how limited the gameplay is. Combat had an interesting rhythm gimmick but it should have been a 5-6 hour, tight experience, not 10-12. It really outstayed its welcome for me given that the game is just combat arenas and cutscenes.

Apart from that combat could be broken by spamming companion abilities once you unlocked them all, it didn’t feel like there was any reason to use different combos than 2 or 3 that worked fine.

I end up with the feeling that the hype around the game comes mainly from the unfair closure of a studio that did something that wasn’t just following trends.

People hold the game up as an example of what’s wrong with the cash grabbing nature of big publishers in the industry, but I just don’t think it’s a good game at all.

  • mohab@piefed.socialEnglish
    1·
    9 months ago

    It is tricky, I agree.

    Another point I think I need to try and comment on:

    Ultimately yeah, I’m saying the game isn’t for me. But I often hear the game in discussions of what the industry is missing in terms of game design, and I don’t think I agree that it’s worth that level of praise.

    I think when people praise Hi-Fi Rush, they basically mean: “Hurray, a mid-budget, FINISHED action romp from a big publisher with a cool gimmick and no intention to drown me in microtransactions!” which is why you see the PS2/PS3/Xbox 360 catalog comparisons.

    I don’t think anyone actually means Hi-Fi Rush is the Jesus Christ of gaming—and if they do, I completely disagree.

    We could use similar games though—specifically in the action game genre. We get very few of those nowadays.