• ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    So they went back to aluminum eh? The cheaper an weaker material is going bring the cost down, right? Right?

    • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Titanium was always a bad choice for thermals. Now they have the Air as the princess phone and the Pros look designed to perform not to look, seems like.

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Aluminium is much lighter than titanium, so these phones will at least be lighter right?

      • tahoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Somehow they managed to make it heavier, 206g for the 17 Pro vs 199g for the 16 Pro. They’ve been hovering at around 200g for a while though, so as ugly as that phone is, it probably isn’t noticeably heavier than like a 13 Pro