• ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s something the US has basically enforced, it’s their excuse to things like military bases in Okinawa, which goes against Japan’s ideas of not having an army (even though the JSDF has broken this promise of sorts). More military spending it’s not going to bring any good to anyone, specially coming from Europe and its record, specially the Brits.

    • solargeek@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’ve had multiple presidents get on their soapbox about defense budgets in Europe. One fat orange man in particular. He’s a corrupt idiot but he wasn’t wrong about that. The NATO % GDP benchmark is not onerous. Only military capability will deter some actors as clearly evidenced most recently in Ukraine.

      • redditors_re_racist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only military capability will deter some actors as clearly evidenced most recently in Ukraine.

        the ukraine was invaded therefore more military spending would deter russians from invading the ukraine?

        • emerty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Has Russia invaded a NATO country? No

          Should Europe have done more in 2014? Yes

          Would Ukraine have been destroyed if they hadn’t received training from NATO members since 2014? Maybe