• IndictEvolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reducing birthrates is not genocide. As long as the population continues to increase, human life will be more and more devalued as we continue to choose quantity over quality of life because of a DNA delusion.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who gets to have kids?

      The poor? The blacks? The Jews?

      Forcibly reducing birthrights is absolutely genocide. Unless you are talking solely of reducing birth rates within your own ethnic group…I wouldn’t call Chinas “one-child” policy genocide, per se, but it absolutely paved the way for systemic infanticide. And that’s not really significantly better.

      • IndictEvolution@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Definitely not poor people. I think requiring a license to have children would not be a bad idea. I would not acknowledge reproduction as a human right, but instead as a form of rape.

        I am also not bothered by infanticide as long as it is done humanely, and assuming both parents do not want the child.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It literally is genocide, by definition. I know you think you are correct and moral, just like everyone else that ends up thinking stuff like this, but you’re not. You need serious psychiatric help as soon possible.