some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoTesla profit tanked 46% in 2025 | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up1844arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.world
arrow-up1840arrow-down1external-linkTesla profit tanked 46% in 2025 | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comsome_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square153linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.world
minus-squareUltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 months agoWelcome to the vibe based economy.
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·3 months agoEcOnOmIcS iS a ScIeNcE!
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoStock prices are related to economics but aren’t the focus of the field.
minus-squarein4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months ago“Surely our models are more true than the laws of nature.”
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI had this exact opinion when Amazon lost less money than expected in 1999. I’m sure people had similar opinions before 1929. This isn’t something new.
Welcome to the vibe based economy.
EcOnOmIcS iS a ScIeNcE!
Stock prices are related to economics but aren’t the focus of the field.
“Surely our models are more true than the laws of nature.”
I had this exact opinion when Amazon lost less money than expected in 1999. I’m sure people had similar opinions before 1929. This isn’t something new.