some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前Tesla profit tanked 46% in 2025 | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square152linkfedilinkarrow-up1843arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.world
arrow-up1839arrow-down1external-linkTesla profit tanked 46% in 2025 | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comsome_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square152linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.world
minus-squareUltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·4 个月前Welcome to the vibe based economy.
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·4 个月前EcOnOmIcS iS a ScIeNcE!
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 个月前Stock prices are related to economics but aren’t the focus of the field.
minus-squarein4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 个月前“Surely our models are more true than the laws of nature.”
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 个月前I had this exact opinion when Amazon lost less money than expected in 1999. I’m sure people had similar opinions before 1929. This isn’t something new.
Welcome to the vibe based economy.
EcOnOmIcS iS a ScIeNcE!
Stock prices are related to economics but aren’t the focus of the field.
“Surely our models are more true than the laws of nature.”
I had this exact opinion when Amazon lost less money than expected in 1999. I’m sure people had similar opinions before 1929. This isn’t something new.