• Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Rolex has spent the last 50 years trying to rebrand itself as a luxury watch brand but they started out as sport watches. Essentially what this Casio watch is.

    The people that designed Rolex watches wanted them to be basically indestructible. They’re wildly over-engineered. They have shockmounts so you can drop them without breaking the balance staff and most are waterproof.

    • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s because Swiss precision is meaningless when a $1 chip can keep time better than a $6k mechanical watch. The only way they can survive is by selling the luxury angle.

  • ooterness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Want to upgrade your F-91W? The open-source Sensor Watch is a board-swap that uses the same display, housing, and wrist-strap but lets you program your own functionality.

  • Copythis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I lost my Casio watch somewhere in my closet about 3 years ago (I am very lazy).

    I still hear it beep every hour.

  • Gonroz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have the calculator watch one and absolutely love it. The reaction people have when they notice is priceless.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love Casio watches; I’ve got about a hundred of them.

    The F91W is most notable for being the cheapest, brand name watch you can buy just about anywhere. Even the poorest dirt farmer can afford to own one. And it has all of the features most people need.

    That said, it’s not the best option for us westerners. They are very tiny watches, more suited to a child’s wrist than a grown man. A better option is a Casio G-Shock GW-M5610U. It’s solar powered with atomic timekeeping, meaning it never runs out of power and always has the correct time.

    Plus, it’s way more durable compared to an F91W. If I could buy a watch for everyone on the planet, it’d be the 5610.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are very tiny watches, more suited to a child’s wrist than a grown man

      As a grown man with child size wrists good I need more options. Most watches I looked at are huge on me. I got a Seiko 5 which fits well though.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        As another man in the tiny wrist club, it’s truly heartbreaking to find out that watch that looks so good in pictures looks absurd when you put it on yourself. I really wanted a speedmaster but at least with the metal strap, it’s just too big.

        F91W is a truly legendary watch though. It’s what I use 90% of the time although swapping the factory rubber wrist strap with a NATO strap is a worthwhile upgrade. The clasp on the factory strap really likes to break.

        I also actually have a Seiko 5 too, very solid budget friendly automatics. Really big modding community too if you want to get into customization.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The amount of compliments I also got from the cheapest watch at a grocery store (also Casio)… I’ve seen listings for some really expensive ones with the same shape and general appearance but different colors and maybe features. Does anyone know what’s up with those?

    • yuri@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Casio does variants of the same model with all stainless steel cases/bands for a bit more, but it’s usually the japan exclusive colorways that see prices north of $70 or so. Casios are usually pretty affordable!

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        $70 isn’t even expensive. Are people really fawning over sub-$100 watches?

        • yuri@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          This perception that cost=quality is so funny. It’s a tragedy that Jules Borel gave up on Mallards. Swiss movements in stainless cases, sold as a price-point piece. Peanuts compared to most shitass luxury watches of the time that used the exact same movement.

          • WoodenBleachers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            What watch, in your opinion, is worth the cost? I’d like something a little nice, but tend to only buy quality items so I don’t re-buy

            • yuri@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Citizen has some quartz models for ~$60 if you’re looking in the right place. I see a lot of ebay sellers that are authorized vendors and are going out of their way with undercut pricing. Find something all stainless if you can, and go for a screw back if you want to replace the battery yourself. I work at a jewelry store and we get at least one person a month who’s ruined their watch by trying to do a battery change themselves.

              If you want digital, Casio and Timex are both currently doing reissues of extremely functional vintage models.

              I like the look of modern Seikos, but I’ve handled very few myself. In the past they were an absolute bitch to get parts for, but that may have changed.

              Any modern mechanical watch should be absolutely avoided, unless you’re a connoisseur looking for a fancy-pants showoff piece. There’s a reason we’re all on quartz now lmao