claim_arguably@lemdro.id to Ask Science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoWhat's a scientific fact that sounds made up but is 100% real?message-squaremessage-square258linkfedilinkarrow-up1210arrow-down15
arrow-up1205arrow-down1message-squareWhat's a scientific fact that sounds made up but is 100% real?claim_arguably@lemdro.id to Ask Science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square258linkfedilink
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoA 70cm diameter soccer ball (>2 ft across) would be kinda fun. Except headers the CTE would be even worse!
minus-squarepodian@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoAll Very true facts. I admit I was and am still taken aback by the measurement and extrapolation of linear distances using… circumference.
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoYeah it’s a weird way to make the distances sound shorter than pi*(a measurement we all can visualize).
minus-squarestate_electrician@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·27 days agoYou could calculate it more accurately, of course. But the relationship between earth’s circumference and the distance to the moon is roughly 1:10, purely by coincidence, making it easy to calculate an estimate when scaling earth up or down.
Diameter or circumference?
A 70cm diameter soccer ball (>2 ft across) would be kinda fun. Except headers the CTE would be even worse!
All Very true facts. I admit I was and am still taken aback by the measurement and extrapolation of linear distances using… circumference.
Yeah it’s a weird way to make the distances sound shorter than pi*(a measurement we all can visualize).
You could calculate it more accurately, of course. But the relationship between earth’s circumference and the distance to the moon is roughly 1:10, purely by coincidence, making it easy to calculate an estimate when scaling earth up or down.