this contradiction always confused me. either way the official company is “losing a sale” and not getting the money, right?

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If a copy isn’t kept after sale, it should be legal. It’s my understanding it is legal in the EU.

    That is if you can sell a game you bought on Steam. Steam makes sure to copies aren’t played at the same time so you can’t keep your copy after selling it.

    • falkerie71@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      From my understanding, you don’t “own” a game you bought on Steam, you just own the license to play it. The game file without modifications is protected by DRM, and only works when it’s launched from Steam with a valid license. Notice when using the same account on two different PCs, Steam would force quit the game when you try to launch the same game from the other PC.

      In a closed system like Steam, sure, it would be relatively easy to regulate the buying and selling of game licenses since you’re doing it all under Steam’s system. When Steam detects a license transfer or however they want to implement it, they can easily disable access for the seller and enable it for the buyer.

      But if the game file is DRM free, then it’s the same as downloading pirated movies, there would be no guarantee that the seller has no access to the game after selling it. No way to regulate it either. Hence, endless copies.