I don’t like Biden either, but anyone with half a brain knows there are two choices in the 2020 election. If we had a sane voting system, voting third party might be worth it, but as it stands, no one but you knows your favorite candidate exists and unless you want to become their campaign manager that will still be true in November. Even if you did, and even if you convinced two thirds of the people who would otherwise have voted for Biden to vote for your chosen candidate instead, Trump would still win because half the country voted for him and your guy only got a third. If you vote third party you might as well stay home.

Not voting isn’t going to stop the genocide in Gaza. The US will continue to funnel them arms no matter which candidate wins this November. Trump practically campaigns on how much he hates the Jews and he’s publicly told Israel to “finish up their war”. He’ll also make life a living hell for anyone who isn’t a straight cisgender male back here at home.

A vote for a candidate is not an endorsement of them or their policies, it’s a statement that you like their policies more than the other guy’s, and “sticking it to liberals” and “refusing to support genocide” (that’s not what voting for Biden is doing, by the way – a vote for either candidate is a vote for genocide and a vote for neither is an endorsement of both) is not more important than keeping the furthest right politician America has ever seen out of office.

How incredibly privileged do you have to be to see an entire national election as what will happen in the Middle East and ignore Trump’s campaign promises to wipe transgender Americans off the map, and further, to not realize that the same thing will happen in the Middle East regardless of which candidate wins?

I hate Biden as much as every other leftist here. But I’ll still vote for him because Trump is worse. If there’s a single bone in your body that cares about the lives of your trans friends you will too.

  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m voting for a third party instead of the slightly less evil fascist. I recommend y’all do as well. Dr. West and Claudia La Cruz are good options.

    If you’re not in a swing state I recommend you do the same.

      • jayWL@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        vote for trump = vote for trump and his genocide

        no vote = also vote for trump and trump fascist genocide

        vote third party = still trump sweetie

        vote biden = not a vote for biden or his own brand of genocide, apparently

        got it.

        before you get mad at me enabling fascism, I am not even amerikkkan, and I hope your country burns to the ground, fascist scum

          • jayWL@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            I did, and all I could surmise was that you mistake liberals for leftists.

            I know shit like Lenin is too much, but you could at least read MLK, the whitewashed saint of liberalism, to see what he really thought of your ilk (particularly, the letter from Birmingham jail)

        • tacosplease@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          You hope America burns to the ground? What country are you in that you think wouldn’t be affected by the collapse of the United States? Power vacuums are dangerous as fuck.

            • tacosplease@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah of course. But it’s messy as hell for a decade or two while the dust settles.

              I was just telling the “I hope your colony burns to the ground” person to be careful with that monkey paw.

            • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              And then theyd get chinese or russian imperialism. Geopolitics is a thing whether u ignore it or not. The US at least is maleable and every year i hear the leftists get louder and more numerous.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                That’s pure prediction, and additionally assumes Americans should decide for the world who is in power, rather than the exploited third world determining for themselves.

                The US is not maleable. It serves the interests of the Bourgoisie, which is why the US gov has been getting more right wing despite rising popularity of leftists.

                • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Its not prediction, russia repeatedly has called Ukraine a stepping stone. I would appreciate it if it werent.

                  It is maleable, if it werent, the right wouldnt expe d the dollars and effort it does into keeping voters from casting their votes.

                  And we got biden over trump, as u said, the youth is more left, and the old generation is dying.

                  Mutual aid, direct action, votes for biden to keep the fascist out, and solidarity.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    It is prediction, and you completely brushed aside your inner bias when I said America should cease their Imperialism and let the third world decide for themselves what they want.

                    It is not malleable, Democrats are right wing as well, just not fascist. You cannot get leftist change by voting for right wingers.

                    Biden is not left. He’s not as far-right as Trump, of course, but even if Biden were an immortal dictator America would never move left. There are more leftists now, yes, but not in office.

                    Mutual Aid and Direct Action are great, but you seem to be under the mistaken impression that Biden winning is leftward movement, and not right wing stagnation.

                    I say this as someone who voted for Biden and likely will again, read Reform or Revolution.

          • jayWL@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            oh no, my economy

            continues to coup the third world and colonize the middle east

              • jayWL@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                oh dont play coy

                your “say vague implications, then backtrack when called out because you never used those exact words” shtick is almost as good as jordan peterson’s.

                no, you didn’t talk specifically about economy, but it was implied I should not be cheering for amerikkka’s fall because I probably live in a western country and would end up worse than I am - economically. Which is probably true. But also, both amerikkka’s as well as my country’s wealth is built on extreme exploitation of the third world, and the world at large would be better if we didn’t exist.

                • tacosplease@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Maybe you’re replying to someone else? My comment was that power vacuums are dangerous as fuck. Not sure how someone thinks “dangerous as fuck” is about the economy?

                • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  not exactly true. don’t discount europe’s contributions to medicine, science, physics, chemistry, etc.

                  but yeah, the western world has been exploitative as fuck. we learned it from the romans, who colonized the shit out of us. it’s a vicious cycle, but i think if we can just beat the fascists and corporations, we are the verge of a new enlightenment.

                  • jayWL@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    ROMANS? “colonized” by ROMANS??? lmao

                    nationalism and the concept of countries didn’t truly exist until like 1700s. Sure, there were some special cases like Poland which has been a “country” (or rather, a united kingdom) since the 10th century, but even for these outliers, the idea of a nation comes waaaaaay after the fucking romans have existed, please stop embarassing yourself.

                    And europe’s contributions to… “medicine, science, phycics, chemistry, etc”, even if we discount the ones that were straight up stolen, is a non-sequitir when we are talking about what europe at large has done to its subjects. Do you think that advances in, for example, electric power production, are worth the countless colonial deaths in middle africa? Europe is pretty fascist still, living on the blood of the third world

                    and, just to send this one home: fuck you, western chauvinist, I hope your life mirrors that of the global lumpenproles, who have no choice but to take your country’s neoliberal “fixes”

            • jayWL@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              nah, I genuinely hope amerikkka falls. I live in a western country and would feel the consequences of that fall, but that’s a tiny price to pay for the Great Satan to die

          • jayWL@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            so you are wasting energy to help democrats with the ninth “most important US election ever” for FREE??? holyyy shiiiiit

          • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            There are literally more options. It’s people like you that prevent a third option from becoming mainstream. Do you understand that??

            • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you got every person on Lemmy to vote for a single third party, you would still only have single-digit percent support. A third party will never get the popular vote, as long as we have first past the post voting.

              • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                All right and if you got every single person on lemmy to vote for the dems or the Republicans, it wouldn’t change the outcome of the election. Are you saying this argument determines absolutely nothing? Because I agree lol.

                Do you know that the popular vote doesn’t determine the outcome of US presidential elections? Cuz it sounds like you don’t understand that. I’m totally for switching to rank choice voting. Sadly we need elected politicians to do that sooooo not really productive 🤷

                If we vote in some third party candidates who are actual leftist, they might enact rank choice voting. So maybe start there.

                • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Almost no one here would vote for Trump, so you’re just pulling votes away from Biden which might be enough to influence the results of the election. A few percent could be all that makes the difference.

                  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    A second ago convincing everyone on lemmy wasn’t “even a single digit percent” now it could be a few percent and change the result of the election🤣? Do you see why I think you are ignorant and dramatic?

                    Like dude I get it trump and his fascist cronies are scary as fuck. But My state will not suddenly become contested in the 2024 election. I guarantee it. It will be blue. My vote for a third party just slowly puts their number up over time to get us out of this mess. The more people who can do that the better. Obviously if you’re in a swing state or state that could become contested. Yeah, vote for the lesser evil. I’m not in that situation. If you’re not able to grasp that, that’s your problem.

                • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Given that 2016 was decided by 20k votes spread across three states, id say that yeah, every person on Lemmy might swing the election.

                  The spoiler effect is real, and ur not going to get a chance for third party candidates to ever matter if the raging turnip were to win.

                  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Ok buddy. This topic and level of nuance seems to be above your comprehension level. I’m going to leave you with a few facts. I won’t be responding to you after this.

                    I voted third party in 2016. Jill Stein.

                    Hillary Clinton won my state in 2016 easily. It’s a very blue state.

                    Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016 but lost the election.

                    I hope you spend some time to fill in the gaps of information you don’t know. I hope you one day learn that it’s okay not to know everything and to not pretend like you know more than you do. Best of luck ✌️

        • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          under normal circumstances, i would be inclined to agree. however, your country’s voting system is anything but normal.

          i’m afraid that your view of the available options is nothing more than misguided.

          you’re throwing away what little choice you have. you’re pretending to make a statement and pretending to support the party that you vote for, knowing full well that they won’t win.

          good luck with trump, my friend; i will be watching in disappointment.

              • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yes, I’m annoyed because you don’t even understand my country’s voting system or why it would matter what state you live in when it comes to voting yet you want to mansplain it to me. You are insufferable lol. I wish men like you who think that they can just guess the correct thing which shut the f****** when someone who knows what they’re talking about is speaking. I’m not going to reply to you again. 🖕

      • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        A vote for Biden is a signal to the Democratic party that we like what they’re doing. There is no incentive for Democrats to change if we keep voting them in out of fear. Right now they are just incentived to be slightly better than the proud White Nationalist dude, which is an extremely low bar.

        • Democrats are unable to go further left because that risks losing votes to the GOP.

          In a 2-party system, you don’t get the choice you want to make. Instead, you have to vote against what you like least, in order to motivate that party to move. You vote dem, so the GOP is forced to change. The parties grow closer together, giving the democrats room to move further left.

          It’s a terrible system. The first candidate that wants to do election reform should be voted in ASAP.

            • Obama was not exactly a progressive, was he? The GOP moved right because Trump pulled them there, and there was a voter base to use. They also had the opportunity, given that Clinton was not as popular as hoped. The media has been shifting rightwards as well. And they will keep moving right as long as they believe it will win them elections.

        • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well we get to have a monoparty system in the inverse, but i guess technically ceasing to exist would be a change for dems.

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s your right. You aren’t even required to understand that the consequences of your actions are that you’re making it easier for a guy who said he wants to be a Dictator, a guy who said he “wants to finish the problem” with regards to Palestinian genocide, a guy who has probably just been outright purchased by a conglomerate of foreign influence.

      You’re giving that guy a helping hand.

      And that’s your right.

            • brianary@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s not what you said. Your original “only” indicates that you think that votes + splitting your opponents votes isn’t a strategy.

              If splitting votes didn’t matter, there wouldn’t be so much effort put into gerrymandering. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/REDMAP

              Voting is a practical, strategic act, not an ideological one.

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                >Voting is a practical, strategic act, not an ideological one.

                every act is morally good, amoral, or immoral. it’s immoral to vote for bad people.

                you may think ends justify the means. you may think your strategy is better or more moral. i disagree.

                • brianary@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  No, I’m sorry, that’s dangerously naïve, and a self-serving, solipsistic moral panic. How old are you?

                  If we used RCV or anything better that winner-take-all, that would be different, or if we had a parliamentary system. But we don’t.

                • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  it’s immoral to vote for bad people.

                  One could argue that it’s immoral to not vote in a way that prevents the worst choice from winning.

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                >If splitting votes didn’t matter, there wouldn’t be so much effort put into gerrymandering.

                you’re falling prey here to a logical fallacy called equivocation. splitting is used in two distinct senses in electoral politics, and you are taking one of its uses and purporting that it supports the validity of the other use. it does not AND the other use is misleading at best, but i believe it’s genuinely dishonest and manipulative.

                  • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    on the one hand there is gerrymandering which has the effect of splitting up voting blocks.

                    on the other hand there is the lie that votes are owned by or owed to only two parties, and any vote outside of those two parties is stolen by the so-called third parties.

                    in fact, the votes belong to voters, and it is up to them to decide who they want to vote for, and it is up to the politicians to try to win those votes.

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                > Your original “only” indicates that you think that votes + splitting your opponents votes isn’t a strategy.

                you are putting words inmy mouth. i explained what i said. i’m the authority on what i meant.

                • brianary@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’m putting your own words in your mouth. I’m sorry you refuse to accept that splitting opponents votes works. Good luck.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Biden and his foolish decisions are giving that guy a helping hand. Try telling Biden to stop being a fucking moron if he wants to win the election.

      • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bro, I live in one of the bluest states. It will not go red. If I were in a swing state I’d understand where you’re coming from. If you don’t understand the difference then this conversation isnt productive.

    • Dinsmore@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      100%. Blue MAGA’s going to come out in force on this thread. If you’re in CA or similar “will go blue no matter what” state, there’s no reason for principled leftists to vote for Biden. Same with “will go red no matter what” states.

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is this notion that most states are “solid red or blue”… except we keep getting surprised in elections, and polling has been shit since at least the 2016 election. I don’t want people in TX giving otherwise Biden votes to some 3rd party when the state as a whole has been trying to become more blue.

        Trump’s new slogan is going to be “Take America Back”. You can buy the merch on AliExpress right now. His followers don’t interpret that to mean “by voting”.

        Save the 3rd party virtue signals for a time when we’re not on the verge of a civil war. The message we should all be sending right now is unified support for the guy who can keep Trump out of the oval office.

        • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Do take note how aggressive these ppl/accounts get at the notions of ppl voting blue.

          We need solidarity, not more division. Go vote for the infinitely less shit candidate, then pursue whatever additional means u feel make changes happen. If ur wasting ur time yelling at ppl for voting or calling them stupid, ur just sowing division.