• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    imagine being so uncustomizable that you’re customizable

    Isn’t really a good argument, even though this is silly

    • leo85811nardo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Extensions are not equivalent to native customization, and both have pros and cons. On one hand, extensions provide a variety of features that can be added specific to people’s likings, but on the other hand, there are chances of incompatibility (in gnome shells for example) and delayed maintenance from developers (which results in having to wait for them to finish the work when dependency updates)