• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      Now we are getting off topic, but no I don’t. You can run through the Muslim countries and they either are too small to supply troops or are large enough, but want nothing to do with Palestinians. It’s an important question in that peacekeepers will surely be needed in the future. It’s should be part of aa plan Bibi doesn’t have.

      • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        There’s more than Arab or Muslim member states on the UN Security Council.

        Of course he doesn’t have a plan with the UN, they consider them hamas members

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          28 days ago

          You won’t get EU countries, they have their own worries. Ya know, all you want to do is be right. Sorry, but this isn’t a reasonable discussion. It’s you taking offense. See ya later.

          • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            I don’t want the US and world to continue enabling a genocide.

            Again it makes so much sense that you can’t find the reasoning or evidence you want

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              28 days ago

              First of all enabling isn’t the word you want in the context you provided. Isreal would still be doing what they are doing without the US.

              You cannot provide one country that would provide peacekeepers, but you criticize me.