Again, I’m pointing out that the predictions you’re using are inaccurate and changing candidates this late in the game would cause a clusterfuck so big it would be a guaranteed win for Trump.
Referencing a time when an election turned out within the margin of error of polling isn’t really pointing out that the predictions are inaccurate. It’s pointing out that you don’t have the media literacy to interpret polling results.
What did the data say for Hillary vs Trump? Was it accurate?
So… Let me get this right. Your only response is literally a named fallacy?
What does your gut say the stock market will do next month, oh wonderful and correct Oracle?
My response was a question that you seem to be avoiding.
Your response was irrelevant. It’s not even data. It’s a literal named fallacy.
“Trump won once, so he will again” is literally the same statement.
Take a critical thinking class, cause you really don’t know how.
Again, I’m pointing out that the predictions you’re using are inaccurate and changing candidates this late in the game would cause a clusterfuck so big it would be a guaranteed win for Trump.
Referencing a time when an election turned out within the margin of error of polling isn’t really pointing out that the predictions are inaccurate. It’s pointing out that you don’t have the media literacy to interpret polling results.