Google ramps up its campaign against ad blockers on Chrome.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember how excited I was when google released a browser. They’ve become such a joke since then.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Noice. I’m sure there’s mirrors up already. Article says it’ll eventually stop working tho. I know I have a few extensions that eventually were disabled daily and I had to enable them each time I started chrome

      This might be what makes he leave for Firefox full time. A bummer indeed

      Edit: ha, just saw what sub/community this is. I use FF but only for browsing… privately ;]

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yea, I’ll have to switch eventually. But let’s hope the manifest v2 is not too difficult to put back in

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why not just use Firefox all the time? Literally zero reason to use Chrome except for the rare website that doesn’t work with Firefox?

        • Fitik@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I can understand them, I use Firefox on my PC, but Chrome on my phone, as I can’t live without tab groups there, for me it’s almost unusable without it, as I always have 100+ tabs open on my mobile browser

          When they’ll add it, I’ll use Firefox on both

            • mke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Using bookmarks as a substitute for tab groups is a very different user experience, though.

                • mke@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t think so. As far as context switching goes, tab groups are faster and, having used both Chrome’s tab groups and Firefox’s bookmarks, I’d argue they’re easier to manage too.

                  The way I see it, each feature has different intended uses. Ideally, I wouldn’t use tab groups as a bookmarks substitute either… but sometimes it happens due to their advantages.

  • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ll just say it.

    People that continue to use chrome, and all of its little forks like Brave and Edge, are the reason why corpos are winning and making the internet worse off in the long run.

    I’ve been using Firefox since I was a kid 20 FUCKING YEARS AGO. Not ONCE have I went to another browser for anything, and I look shit up constantly, pay my bills through Firefox, and everything between the two.

    Stop making excuses, and just use ANYTHING other than fucking CHROME. I don’t care if it’s safari, ladybird, or fucking internet explorer. Just stop using a browser that is built by an ad company masquerading as a fucking tech company.

    Jesus.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I like it when the garbage identifies itself openly. We don’t need Chrome, but Chrome needs us.

  • Technofrood@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can’t use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it “presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions.” The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

    Is this a badly worded paragraph, but is uBlock Origin really using remotely hosted code? I thought it was a different restriction in manifest V3 that stops as blockers being effective.

    • unrushed233@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is this a badly worded paragraph, but is uBlock Origin really using remotely hosted code? I thought it was a different restriction in manifest V3 that stops as blockers being effective.

      I think it kinda is badly worded, and it refers to code/data that is dynamically loaded by an extension, after it’s installed by the user, which uBlock Origin does use for filter lists. They can’t be bundled with the extension, because they get out of date really quickly and often need to get updated, so uBlock Origin just downloads a new blocklist and saves it in its cache. MV3 wants to prohibit this, making adblockers almost useless. Updating the extension every time there is an update to one of uBlock’s many blocklists just isn’t feasible. I think they can also hold back updates to the extension in the Chrome Web Store, which they might to if a blocklist starts to include something Google doesn’t like (e.g. YouTube ads). All of this is just a shitshow and people should switch to better browsers with actual API compatibility for purposes like adblocking. The best examples are Firefox and LibreWolf.

    • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think Google might just be calling block lists “externally hosted code”. As I understand it, there are several restrictions: the severe limitation on the number of rules, the requirement to bundle rules with the addon (and the associated delay due to extension store review), and the loss of many advanced rule types that change blocking behavior based on different factors in order to avoid detection and otherwise be effective.

      The ublock FAQ has some interesting details too: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#filtering-capabilities-which-cant-be-ported-to-mv3