It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    A lot of it is the sheer bureaucracy of chasing down actual pirates and weeding them from people who just happen to be on the same IP address.

    If one guy visiting an apartment block downloads a torrent from a public connection, what is ATT supposed to do? Shut down Internet to the entire building?

    This is an undue burden for ISPs, even if the content isn’t living in a gray zone of legality.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah IP owners really want to have all the benefits of ownership with none of the drawbacks. After lobbying for and receiving a blank check to be able to rent seek indefinitely, they are constantly acting to outsource any cost of detection and enforcement of “their” property. Disgusting how goddamn entitled they are.

      • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        this is why everyone should pirate literally anything they can, even if they don’t particularly want it.

        er, with a few very gross exceptions that shouldn’t exist.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      … IP addresses are assigned to modems… They don’t assign IP addresses to… Cables going to buildings I guess lol but ok.

      And if you’re in some fucked up place that has the entire apartment complex’s internet going to one modem, then God save your soul.