I want to buy a large new tv mostly for my steamdeck. I dont want it to access the internet for obvious reasons. I live in a community with wide open wifi everywhere that requires no password, so devices turned on here just hook up automatically. Im not tech savvy so wont be doing any raspberry pi black magic. Any suggestions about specific televisions or workarounds in this situation would be greatly appreciated.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can use a smart tv but not connect it to the wifi. We have a Phillips 43pfs5525 and we just never connected it to the wifi.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        The wifi may be on, but it won’t automatically connect to a network, even if it’s open. You’d have to specify which network to connect to.

        My advice? Steer clear of Samsung. I have two and the HDR implementation on both is absolute shit with no way to disable it. Picture looks great without it, but with it turned on everything is dark, muddy and unwatchable.

        Only way around it is to disable HDR on every device connected to it.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d say get a computer monitor rather than something sold as a TV. Less likely to spy on you. If your TV has a microphone, assume it is listening.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    LG recently had a nice set of stripped-down-to-monitor TVs, i.e. TVs without that “smart” crap. Available in TV sizes, but none of the junk that spouts ads or intrudes into your privacy.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I picked up an LG OLED 50 " on sale for $899.00 at Best buy. Pretty decent deal for a full OLED screen. It has all the smart shit, I just don’t connect to wifi. Librelec works great through a PI. The HDMI transmits remote control through HDMI cable and I can control the media server with the same remote. Pleasant surprise.

  • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have an Onn TV that I quite enjoy. I intend to eventually connect it to an isolated network where it won’t have real Internet access, but for now I just use it as a 4k dumb tv

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think what qualifies as “large” really depends on the space you’re putting it in, what you’re used to, and how old you are.

            When I was a kid, unless you were rich, there’s a good chance the TV in your living room was a CRT in the 30-40-ish inch range. I bought myself a 50" TV for my room when I was 18 with money I saved from my first job as one of my first big purchases for myself,and with the bezels at the time it was probably closer to a modern 55 or 60 inch tv in overall size. That thing seemed huge to me, especially given how small my bedroom was, even though it’s probably pretty standard these days.

            So to me, 50" is kind of the benchmark for where I start calling a TV “big” even though I have a 70inch in my home now, and if I were filthy rich I could have one that’s over 100" now.

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              What is big changed over time. When I was in college I had a 28” CRT that was big for the time. But with higher pixel counts you can get a bigger screen without losing sharpness.

              Ideally you replace a 28” CRT (576p) with about a 50” 1080p TV, which would then be replaced with a 100” 2160p TV.

          • IMALlama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I feel old, but also haven’t bought a TV in ages so I don’t really know the market. 55" used to be very large unless you wanted to shell out serious $$

              • IMALlama@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s nuts to me. We paid around $1.2k for our 55" about 10 years ago. 77" also feels way too big for our space, but it would be nice to jump up from 1080 and have more contrast/dynamic range, etc. I recently bought a laptop with a 3k OLED display and it’s beautiful. An OLED TV seens like it would be amazing.

                • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I went from a 50” to a 65” to a 77”, I live in an apartment, maybe 3.5m viewing distance. You go from “damn that’s big” to “I wish I could afford something bigger” in about 2 days.

                  Fortunately prices keep coming down so if you upgrade every 5-10 years or so you can usually afford the next step up. I currently have what was LG’s top of the line OLED last year (77” G3) and it was about €3k5.