Yea it contributes to widen the conversation so, yeah not a direct answer, but it has value in this kind of forum. I’m cool with it.
Yea it contributes to widen the conversation so, yeah not a direct answer, but it has value in this kind of forum. I’m cool with it.
If it’s consecutive incidents of the same transgression it think it’s seen as a spree, like one crime carried out in pieces. It makes sense from a legal reasoning point of view.
Not for nuthin’ but I’d subscribe to that channel!
Jeez. In that case it wasn’t someone poor just trying to get by, she was running a business. She sold the merchandise.
Does anyone else feel like 3 years is way too lenient? That kind of greedy shit should send the person away for like a decade.
I initially misunderstood also. He didn’t mean tv service he meant an actual tv.
Unless he didn’t and everyone else misunderstood.
It’s the Rent-A-Center demographic they’re targeting, my friend.
I think, in an instant.
I don’t think ZTE are banned in the U.S. I’ve bought and sold them on eBay. I haven’t used one but I think the carriers attached were ordinary American cellular companies.
You know all you’re donating to is to keep funding kids sitting in yeshivas so they can get indoctrinated to become Hasidic leeches off society. That’s where it actually goes.
lol especially because it’s advertising a fraud operation.
The goddamn Macarena.
Vanguard S&P 500 fund.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
No I cannot give you an example. I was postulating that it could be a demographic that hates the bot. I don’t think an example cited is necessary to consider this a possible contributor. Relax.
In addition to the explanations already posited, I’d also think there most likely are some people who want to lie, argue disingenuously, and a fact-checker tends to get in the way of their rhetoric.
Seriously? Is this for real? No, this is a joke right?
Cool. I’ll watch it.
I don’t think they want to publicize every aspect, since this would likely give a distasteful kind of vibe. Doesn’t mean they don’t do it. I’m not saying they do, but not including it in an exposé is not exactly conclusive that it’s false. Am I making sense?