All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

  • 1 Post
  • 1.74K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • The point you felt was worth making a week later

    Again, five days ago. Some people like myself stumble upon a post/comment days and days later from when its initially posted.

    is that I am free to block someone who does something I find kind of annoying?

    Yeah, for some reason people who complain about me using a license seem to keep forgetting that option, but instead just continue to complain, for some strange reason, no matter how many times I remind them of that option. Thought it was a good PSA to remind the complainers they they have alternatives to complaining.

    That seems a little extreme to me.

    If that seems extreme to you, then you need to touch grass more often.

    Extreme would be continuing to complain about something that you have the power to change, but don’t change.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)










  • There is a dude (or maybe more than one) that in all his comments he has an anti AI flair, or something like that,

    I wonder who they are? 😜

    For the record, I’m not the only one, nor the first one, to do it. I saw someone else do it, and decided to adopt it for myself as well. I’m aware of three people (and one large company) who are currently licensing their content here on Lemmy.

    I wonder if that would have any effect.

    One way to find out. It’s an easy enough piece of text to put into your comments…

    [~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en)

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)





  • Who cares what lemmy.world said?

    It’s where the content was initially posted, so any terms of service would be applicable to the content at the time of posting. That’s why.

    The onus is on the Federated server receiving the content that’s already licensed to reject the content if they do not want to abide by the license. If they accept the content, they have to abide by the license.

    And as far as the rest of you diatribe, I’ll just remind you that licenses can’t just be stripped from content because some third-party TOS says it can.

    We would have seen much ‘money laundering’ style mayhem on the Internet with other people’s content before today, if that was possible.

    I think we’ve discussed this enough, so I’m just going to leave it with an ‘agree to disagree’, and move on.

    Have a nice day.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)



  • I hold to my argument. In the current Lemmy (and fediverse environment as a whole) I can put on my server that my placing data on my server, you forego all licenses, and I can do what I like.

    You keep arguing the wrong point.

    No one is saying you can’t on your server create a TOS that says that anyone who puts content on your server that you then own that content, you become the owner. That’s not what’s being discussed.

    The point is because of various reasons like safe harbor and PR, Lemmy World and other servers in the Federation are not claiming ownership.

    When you post your comment on the Lemmy World server, you still own it, and you can license that content that you own in any way that you like, and that license is on the content, not on the server, so as that content is federated, that license travels with it and is still in action, and must be abided by.

    I think this is a new area that doesn’t have a clear definition yet, and since other sites can have clauses saying you give up ownership by using it, I think that could be argued here too.

    I feel confident in my position, because if we went with your position then it would be very easy to “money launder” anyone’s content by just passing it through a third party Federated server with a TOS that says they own any content on their server. I’m pretty sure the big boys who own content aren’t going to allow that to happen, and would talk to their friends in Congress about it.

    It’s really mostly existing basic content law. It’s not as cloudy and up in the air as everyone wants to say it is, there’s just a new wrinkle to it, and I’m pretty sure those in power will make sure everything stays status quo.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)


  • I can go and add that to my ToS right now, that anything you give me will be trained. I say in there that I will disregard any license on there, and by placing anything on my server you are relieving yourself of any license. Since it’s my server, I can say that. “If you don’t want your data trained on, don’t put it on my server.”

    So you’re setting up a straw man by adding the TOS clause of ownership on the posting server to your example. I’m not saying that. The issue being discussed by me in response to your comment was if a license on content that is being federated stays with the content or is somehow magically stripped off when its federated.

    As far as your TOS example goes, If Lemmy World added to their TOS that any content added to their site they own, then I wouldn’t post any content on Lemmy, as I want to keep ownership of my content.

    But since Lemmy World does not do that (smartly so for safe harbor reasons), then the creator of the content is the owner of the content, and if they license that content it carries forward as the content is federated. Its up to the receiver of the federated content to reject the content, or abide by its licensing.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)