Thank you for pointing that out! Yes, if I’m correct in assuming, Trump serves more as a figurehead, primarily representing ideas gained from the Heritage Foundation. As you mentioned, this reflects the dynamics of the whole party.

The issue spans both sides, in my experience. While the situation is drastically worse on the Republican side, we must consider that both sides lack true, meaningful political and leadership skills. Leaders today not only need to embrace knowledge of current political ideals but also integrate studies from fields such as psychology, developmental science, and environmental science.

Furthermore, a leader must possess a level of empathy that is often hard to find. Currently, we tend to vote for candidates who are perceived as the best choices based on their long-standing presence in politics.

Thank you so much for your insights on this article. It’s crucial to collaborate and raise awareness to build a better future for everyone.

We must consider the benefits of AI as such and how they can contribute to our life. I can assure you prices of such while AI may seem like a game or useless thing for others. It’s actually a useful tool able to help others understand complex concepts that most people have a hard time explaining or won’t. Many more things too.

The assertion that “we don’t have any moral obligation to reach our potential” is an interesting one. From a purely scientific and natural standpoint, I can understand this perspective. However, I would argue that the drive to reach our potential should be deeply instilled in us, not just for the benefit of others, but also because it fundamentally changes our understanding of nature and existence.

Regarding your first point, I see it as a blend of both creation and chance. Nature itself is the force that brought us into being, with the innate desire and need to evolve. Yet, our existence is also the result of specific evolutionary pressures that occurred by chance—an intricate balance of intent and randomness.

As for the second point, the idea of a creator is indeed intriguing. I tend to think that if a creator exists, it may not have directly created humanity. Instead, we might be the ones who have created the concept of creators or a creator. This brings to mind the possibility of a higher, all-powerful deity for whom our entire universe might be nothing more than an idea or a game. This deity, in turn, could have allowed for the existence of other, smaller deities who are powerful to us, but mere fragments of the ultimate creator’s imagination.

On the third point, I agree that if an original god did not create us and this reality, intelligent life arose through chance. It’s likely that intelligent life will arise again, or perhaps it already has, elsewhere in the universe.

Hahahaaa I’m just waiting for Plan A honestly. It’s a 10 year injection that is 100% effective. With blocking sperm but allowing everything else.