Like others have said defensive wars. But I also don’t take issues with a countries that have a brief compulsory service system in times of peace as a means of ensuring a large pool of qualified fighters without a large standing army.
Think you meant non elected.
But the point is that policy decisions aren’t to be made by courts or agencies. They are to be made by an elected legislature, informed by the Congregational Research Services. To ensure the separation of powers.
Then the Executive agencies are to be tasked with enforce of the law. And if conflict should arise in the understanding of the law the judiciary is to interpret the law. And while judges are not experts in everything they are the experts in statutory interpretation.
My perspective having known about Chevron before Friday is that while this is a big development for admin law people seem to be overstating the impact it will likely have. Agencies like the EPA, FDA, etc can still make rules as before now courts just have to judge arguments on interpretation impartially, like they did before the SCOTUS made the doctrine in the 80s aiding Reagan. The SCOTUS hasn’t even applied it since 2016.
Forestalling legislation is one of the most pernicious aspects of certain judicial rulings. Rather than concrete protections we get thin shells waiting for a new ruling to crack.
TLDR a history of French colonialism which is why people want Kenya at the wheel on any intervention rather than a former colonial power.
I feel bad for Suno’s lawyer.
The funny thing is there’s a bunch of Portlands, but it’s always that particular one.
The subtext is Todd is too afraid to remake that porn studio in Fallout 2, that was there for some reason.
PCs. Gaming laptop underperform for price, are larger than non gaming laptops, and generally are less serviceable & durable. Just the entire market segment lags behind.
Bikes are a scam perpetuated by big tire. Run at full speed for all of your travel.
Pros:
Cons:
This model just came out recently. I wouldn’t pass judgement on them for that.
It’s about the context in which you wear it.
I believe for a period once the German anti nuclear movement started there was an increase in fossil fuel usage. But I’m not sure if that is still the case of the top of my head.
Or he could be referring to the environmental impacts of certain renewable being worse in some aspects like hydro impacting migratory patterns of aquatic life.
That’s the problem. No people ever think they’re the unenlightened ones. Society changes but not always for the better.
The Constitution is a safety rail to protect us from ourselves.
I think this cleared up our disconnect. I chose oblige to indicate that they require others to do something for them to occur. Most often paying taxes, to pay the provider of a service. This typically isn’t a ‘at gunpoint’ interaction. But negative rights will never require another to do something for it to be practiced.
I agree with your highlighting of the philosophy behind them. I was more concerned about a short rememberable way to differentiate the two.
So I chose oblige vs force to make sure it had the connotation of a civil concession.
I really like the texturing of the bone. Very tasteful. But the brush used on the eye/nose seems inconsistent with the rest of the work. Gives me early 2000 vibes in a good way.
Right tools for the right jobs. The issues arise when it’s out of place.
It absolutely the least democratic, they aren’t representatives they’re judges. They side with the laws enacted by the people, not the people. And all federal judges are appointed.
That power has been with the judicial branch for 180+ years before it was given by the Court to the agency in the 80s to prop up a Reagan interpretation of the Clean Air Act.